We must set the rules for AI use in scientific writing and peer review

George Chalhoub argues for transparent and enforceable guidelines for regulating the use of AI in scientific peer review. "AI is a tool, not a decision-maker. Protecting the credibility of the scientific record demands transparent disclosure, clear guidelines, accountability for both researchers and reviewers, and continuous evaluation of the guidelines to reflect new AI capabilities, risks and best practices. Otherwise, the integration of AI risks reducing scientific publishing to a matter of untrustworthy automated processing, rather than a careful, human-centred pursuit of knowledge." Read more, including more on why addressing this issue is so pressing, in Times Higher Education.