Faculty Associate Dasha Pruss and coauthor Jessie Allen argue that LLMs provide politically illegitimate modes of juridical decisionmaking because they truncate the possibility of human discretion. They argue in a paper forthcoming in the Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics and Society (AIES) that the chief problem with using LLMs to discern the 'ordinary meaning' of a law "is that it substitutes the aggregated subjective judgments of the surveyed humans, including whatever biases they harbor – or the LLM’s pre- diction of the collective accumulation of those subjective results – for the ultimate judicial determination of what the law is."
You might also like
- communityLove in the Time of A.I. Companions
