"Protecting human expression is qualitatively different from enabling algorithmic manipulation of human attention." Writing in The Atlantic, Faculty Associate, Allison Stanger argues that the Supreme Court’s unanimous decision upholding the TikTok ban marks a turning point in how U.S. law distinguishes between human speech and platform-driven algorithmic amplification. She calls for new legal frameworks that protect free expression without shielding opaque systems that distort public discourse, especially when controlled by foreign powers.
Read more in The Atlantic.
You might also like
- storyCensorship Chronicles