Skip to the main content

Nathan Sanders is a data scientist focused on creating open technology to help vulnerable communities and all stakeholders participate in the analysis and development of public policy. 

Nathan's new book is Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship (MIT Press, 2025), co-authored with Bruce Schneier. As a Berkman Klein Center Fellow in 2020-2021, Nathan helped create the Harvard Climate Justice Design Fellowship program and the Massachusetts Platform for Legislative Engagement (MAPLE). Nathan has helped build and lead data science teams in industry at Legendary Pictures, WarnerMedia, Flagship Pioneering, and Harvard Business Publishing developing and applying methods in Bayesian inference, natural language processing, computer vision, and deep learning. 

In the policy domain, he has built open source applications for participatory oversight of environmental regulation in collaboration; helped public health agencies navigate nationwide public comment about controversial proposed legislation; developed statistical methods for public health analysis modeling long term trends in the rate of mass public shootings; and served as a science policy fellow in the Massachusetts Senate and House of Representative. Nathan is a co-founder of the astrophysical literature digest Astrobites, the multi-lingual association of graduate student science writing collaboratives ScienceBites, and the international science communication workshop series ComSciCon. Nathan did his undergraduate work in Physics and Astrophysics at Michigan State University and earned his PhD in Astronomy and Astrophysics from Harvard University.

News

CommonWealth Beacon
Jun 29, 2025

Mass. must resist Congress’s proposed moratorium on state AI regulation

Faculty Associate Nathan Sanders and Executive Director Alexander Pascal warn that a federal moratorium on state AI regulation would paralyze innovation in responsible governance.

Community

Lawfare

Like Social Media, AI Requires Difficult Choices

Social media was supposed to amplify our voices, but it ended up controlling us. Will AI be the same?

Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier liken rapid AI development to the social media boom of the past two decades.

Dec 1, 2025
The Contrarian

How to build AI for democracy

Good governance of artificial intelligence requires providing for trustworthy AI

"Governments must grapple with artificial intelligence (AI) and not simply consign its development and application to corporate entities," argue Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders…

Dec 1, 2025
The Guardian

Four ways AI is being used to strengthen democracies worldwide

Affiliates Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier suggest that, though the technology undoubtedly has its risks, AI presents opportunities "to make democracy better, stronger, and more…

Nov 23, 2025
Fulcrum

Who Will Be the First American Candidate To Harness AI

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders look to examples from around the globe to anticipate how the 2026 midterm elections might be shaped by AI.

Nov 11, 2025
Fast Company

Will AI weaken democracy?

Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders argue that the future of AI's impacts on democratic processes is unwritten, and whether the technology is used to liberate or to…

Nov 4, 2025
IEEE Spectrum

Scientists Need a Positive Vision for AI

It’s time to lead reform, block harm, and advance the public good

Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders offer an optimistic outlook: AI-generated harms are neither natural nor inevitable, and beneficial uses of the technology are possible.

Oct 29, 2025
The American Prospect

AI Is Changing How Politics Is Practiced in America

Here’s what to expect in the midterm elections.

AI's influence on the 2026 electoral cycle will be greater than what many feared leading to 2024, warn Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders. In a new piece for The American Prospect,…

Oct 10, 2025
TIME

How AI Could Drive the 2026 Midterm Elections

A year out from the 2026 midterm elections, Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier expect that AI use will differ along party lines, with Republicans "poised to exploit the technology"…

Oct 4, 2025
The Conversation

Will AI take your job? The answer could hinge on the 4 S's of the technology's advantages over humans

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders speak to fears about AI replacing humans' jobs, opining that this will only happen when it outperforms us in terms of speed, scale, scope, and/or…

Jun 16, 2025
Foreign Policy

UAE AI-Written Legislation Isn't Necessarily A Terrible Idea

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders offer some optimistic reflections on the rise of AI-written legislation, though they concede that such AI use should be disclosed.

May 14, 2025
Tech Policy Press

Why US States Are the Best Labs for Public AI

Affiliate Nathan Sanders and Alex Pascal argue that better AI futures are possible, particularly if the technology is responsibly deployed by states.

Apr 3, 2025
the atlantic

It’s Time to Worry About DOGE’s AI Plans

"The idea of replacing dedicated and principled civil servants with AI agents, however, is new—and complicated."

Feb 17, 2025
The Atlantic

It’s Time to Worry About DOGE’s AI Plans

Welcome to the end of the human civil servant.

Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders warn of the risks posed by DOGE’s extreme approach to AI implementation.

Feb 10, 2025
Lawfare

AI Will Write Complex Laws

AI is poised to help legislators write more intricate laws, exercising increasing control over the executive.

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders detail the different ways that evolving AI technologies will be used in drafting legislation.

Jan 16, 2025
IEEE Spectrum

AI Mistakes Are Very Different Than Human Mistakes

We need new security systems designed to deal with their weirdness

We've gotten the hang of correcting and preventing human actors' mistakes, but how ought we to prepare for new kinds of mistakes wrought by AI, ask Bruce Schneier and Nathan…

Jan 13, 2025
CommonWealth Beacon

Does AI interfere in our democracy?

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders join Jennifer Smith to discuss ways to wield AI toward pro-democratic ends.

Dec 9, 2024
Boston Review

Trust Issues

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders suggest that AI's history is not its destiny.

Dec 4, 2024
The Conversation

The apocalypse that wasn’t

AI was everywhere in 2024’s elections, but deepfakes and misinformation were only part of the picture

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders observe that AI's role in 2024 elections wasn't as disastrous as some had feared.

Dec 2, 2024
WIRED

Algorithms Are Coming for Democracy—but It's Not All Bad

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders offer a potentially optimistic outlook on AI and politics.

Nov 26, 2024
The American Prospect

The SEC Whistleblower Program Is Dominating Regulatory Enforcement

Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders warn that AI will complicate the SEC's financially cutting in whistleblowers.

Oct 18, 2024
Politico

Tonight’s strange debate with an AI congressional candidate

Nathan Sanders weighs in on a debate between two Virginia congressional candidates and an AI bot.

Oct 17, 2024
Marketplace Tech

What do generative AI and social media have in common? A lack of regulation.

Teens' use of AI may be cause for concern.

Oct 1, 2024
The Atlantic

AI Could Still Wreck the Presidential Election

We could soon see the fallout from a hands-off approach to AI regulation.

Sep 24, 2024
MIT Technology Review

Let’s not make the same mistakes with AI that we made with social media

BKC Affiliates Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier argue that the unregulated evolution of social media over the past few decades provides lessons for the AI revolution.

Mar 13, 2024
Brookings Institute

How public AI can strengthen democracy

Nathan Sanders, Bruce Schneier, and Norman Eisen advocate for a public AI to counterbalance private AI and promote tech that benefits all people, not just corporate interests.

Mar 4, 2024
Jacobin

How the “Frontier” Became the Slogan of Uncontrolled AI

BKC Affiliates Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier argue that big tech uses the conception of AI as a new "frontier" to excuse exploitation and a lack of oversight or accountability.

Feb 27, 2024
Harvard Kennedy School Ash Center

Who's accountable for AI usage in digital campaign ads? Right now, no one.

BKC Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders explore the patchwork of organizations charged with regulating AI usage in political campaign ads.

Oct 11, 2023
WIRED

Nervous About ChatGPT? Try ChatGPT With a Hammer

BKC Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders opine on the great power that AI will have once it is capable of using real-world tools and urge that companies and regulators…

Aug 29, 2023
MIT Technology Review

Six ways that AI could change politics

BKC Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders propose six milestones that will bring in a new era of AI driven democratic politics.

Jul 28, 2023
Government Technology

Can You Trust AI? Here’s Why You Shouldn’t

BKC Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders write about the potential risks and biases of AI.

Jul 20, 2023
The Conversation

AI could shore up democracy – here’s one way

BKC Affiliate Nathan Sanders writes about the drawbacks and the opportunities AI can provide to strengthen democracy.

Jun 20, 2023
Foreign Policy

Build AI by the People, for the People

BKC Affiliates Bruce Schneier and Nathan Sanders write about the need for AI investment to be taken out of the hands of private companies.

Jun 12, 2023
Gizmodo

Can We Build Trustworthy AI?

BKC Affiliates Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier write about the trustworthiness of AI technologies and their corporate owners.

May 4, 2023
The Atlantic

Just Wait Until Trump Is a Chatbot

BKC Affiliates Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier write about how AI will change the nature of campaigning.

Apr 28, 2023
Slate

How Artificial Intelligence Can Aid Democracy

BKC Affiliates Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier write about AI's potential to advance the public good by helping democracy.

Apr 21, 2023
The Boston Globe

Twitter is for roasting Donald Trump. Building a democracy? Not so much.

BKC Affiliate Nathan Sanders' policymaking project, the Massachusetts Platform for Legislative Engagement, or MAPLE, is discussed as an alternative to Twitter.

Apr 13, 2023
MIT Technology Review

How AI could write our laws

BKC Affiliates Nathan Sanders and Bruce Schneier write about the potential influence of ChatGPT and generative AI on lobbying.

Mar 14, 2023
Mashable

ChatGPT could be a useful AI tool. So how are we regulating it?

"My observation would be that the serious legislation that's been successfully passed for regulating machine learning in general has been painfully slow and insufficient to keep…

Feb 2, 2023
The New York Times

How ChatGPT Hijacks Democracy

"So while it’s impossible to predict what a future filled with A.I. lobbyists will look like, it will probably make the already influential and powerful even more so." BKC…

Jan 15, 2023

Events

Apr 5, 2023 @ 12:30 PM

Digital Public Spaces for a Healthy Democracy: goals, values & aspirations

Join us on April 5 for a discussion about how to reimagine the digital public square...