[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] [OT] Money-where-your-mouth-is department
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] [OT] Money-where-your-mouth-is department
- From: John Galt <galt(at)inconnu.isu.edu>
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 19:30:12 -0600 (MDT)
- Cc: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- In-reply-to: <OF801BEB02.CC3D233C-ON88256C4F.00704ECA@aero.org>
- Mail-followup-to: galt@inconnu.isu.edu
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
There was some question as to whether the people REing the :CueCat had
actually ACCEPTED the shrinkwrap, as it was on the software portion...
On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
>Let's consider another hypothetical...there once was this company that had
>a great idea. They mailed out in Forbes magazine these scanners. They gave
>them away at RadioShafts. They mailed them to people who requested them.
>ANd then when people started to use them in ways they didn't like they
>mailed out a bunch of letters saying "you are violating our intellectual
>property. We didn't give you authorization to reverse engineer our
>product"...starts to sound a little too close for my comfort...
>
- --
The Internet must be a medium for it is neither Rare nor Well done!
<a href="mailto:galt@inconnu.isu.edu";>John Galt </a>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQE9p3sn+ZSKG3nWr3ARAkDzAKC+xP7xnxeSjeBOiQ1k+j+5VWff4gCdH9Kt
DX/EIFOStecteDxAnXwAxgM=
=3fby
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----