[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [dvd-discuss] [OT] Money-where-your-mouth-is department

I knew there was a reason I put that thing in the trash can!

>From the start, I was skeptical of the devices' use.  I never connected
mine, and have thrown several away since [one that was a gift from a
next-door neighbor.  :)

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
[mailto:owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu] On Behalf Of John Galt
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 6:30 PM
To: 'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'
Cc: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] [OT] Money-where-your-mouth-is department

-----pgpenvelope processed message

There was some question as to whether the people REing the :CueCat had
actually ACCEPTED the shrinkwrap, as it was on the software portion...

On Fri, 11 Oct 2002, Michael A Rolenz wrote:

>Let's consider another hypothetical...there once was this company that
>a great idea. They mailed out in Forbes magazine these scanners. They
>them away at RadioShafts. They mailed them to people who requested
>ANd then when people started to use them in ways they didn't like they
>mailed out a bunch of letters saying "you are violating our
>property. We didn't give you authorization to reverse engineer our
>product"...starts to sound a little too close for my comfort...

The Internet must be a medium for it is neither Rare nor Well done!
<a href="mailto:galt@inconnu.isu.edu";>John Galt </a>

-----pgpenvelope information
Hash: SHA1
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76

gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
gpg: Signature made Fri Oct 11 21:30:15 2002 EDT using DSA key ID 79D6AF70
gpg: BAD signature from "John Galt <galt@inconnu.isu.edu>"

pgpenvelope_decrypt: message processed at Fri Oct 11 22:01:39 2002

-----end pgpenvelope information