Summary of Four Phases

From Internet Law Program 2011
Jump to: navigation, search
iLaw Wiki Navigation
Pillar Themes of iLaw
Open Systems/Access · Online Liberty and FOE
The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity · Intellectual Property
Digital Humanities · Cooperation · Privacy
Cross-sectional Themes of iLaw
The History of the Internet
The Global Internet · Interoperability
The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies
The Future of the Internet
Case Studies
Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries
Exploring the Arab Spring · Minds for Sale
User Innovation · Mutual Aid
Misc
Program Schedule · Program Logistics
Evening Events · Student Projects · Participation
Old iLaw Videos · Mid-Point Check-in

Overview: The Four Phases of Internet Regulation

"Over the past few decades, the world wide web has gone from an 'open net,' characterized primarily by the freedoms it afforded, to a hotly contested environment, characterized by the political battles that rage upon it. What was once known as 'cyberspace' is now an environment in which debates fly, activism flourishes and fails, and political and military contests play out between states." (John Palfrey, "Four Phases of Internet Regulation")

Since its inception, the Internet has gone through four distinct periods of regulation, each of which we will cover in more depth during our live meeting.

Phase 1: The Open Internet: 1960s-2000

Few people initially thought that it was possible to regulate the Internet. "Cyberspace" was considered to be a space apart from the real world; one that was to a large extent exempt from its laws.

Some aspects of the "Open Internet" theory still characterize the net to this day. It is still seen as a space of free expression, or as a tool for transparency for governments; it serves as a force for democratization and collective action; and, in countries like Egypt where the media is heavily controlled, the Internet remains a forum for open discussion.

However, these initial arguments that cyberspace existed in a world apart and would continue to be distinct from the real world were flawed.

Phase 2: Access Denied: 2000 to 2005

In the new millennium, governments began to believe that some Internet activity needed to be blocked. During this phase, geopolitical lines became established on the Internet, and filtering began to occur at the national level, with countries employing both technological and 'soft controls' to censor.

Some filtration was more positively censorial, as in the case of democratic countries that blocked child pornography. While technically skilled citizens could dodge these filters, the majority of citizens were unable, thus leading to relatively effective filtering.

Phase 3: Access Controlled: 2005 to 2010

In the "Access Controlled" phase, the first generation filters and blocks became supplemented by more flexible controls that were implemented at a diverse range of points. These new technologies were more nuanced and adaptive than the original blocks, and they enabled governments to selectively block parts of cyberspace at convenient, politically charged moments.

The "Access Controlled" phase of Internet filtration acknowledges a world of interconnected online and offline lives, breaking down the original myth of a separation between cyberspace and the real world.

Phase 4: Access Contested: 2010 and Beyond

As cyberspace is perceived less as a space apart and more as an intrinsic part of our lives, citizens become more resistant to the limitations exacted by private and governmental filtration and censorship.

Groups like the Global Network Initiative and politically active citizens like protestors in Pakistan will continue to be active in fighting back against internet controls and defining the governance of cyberspace.