The Judicial Gatekeeping Project
Home | About the Gatekeeping Project | Judicial Gatekeeping Book | Educational Resources |
| Message Board | News & Developments | Subscribe to the Judicial Gatekeeping Newsletter |
| Site Map | Search | Contact Us | Credits | Back
STATE PAPERS &
CONFERENCES

Regional
& National Conferences

Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Mississippi
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oregon
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Vermont
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming

 
ABOUT THE GATEKEEPING PROJECT


This page is still under contruction.

BRIEF SUBJECT DESCRIPTION

The seminars focus on the "gate-keeping" role of judges. Ever since the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Daubert v. Richardson Merrill-Dow in 1993, questions have raged about the nature and extent of the judicial gatekeeping role in assessing the admissibility of expert scientific testimony, about the reach of the gatekeeping role to other forms of expert and non-expert testimony, and about the means, methods and procedures judges can use in performing the gatekeeping function.

A SAMPLING OF QUESTIONS TO BE EXPLORED:

Can a tort system, designed to allow lay people to apply common sense to questions of everyday negligence, deal with complex issues on which experts cannot agree?

The courts have tried to codify what constitutes "good science" – including standards of peer review and applicability outside a specific case, but there is still not much guidance in how and when to apply these guidelines.  New science does not mean bad science.  Is it the judge’s responsibility to help the jury distinguish the difference?

The judge is often no more scientifically knowledgeable than the jury.  Who helps the judge?  Should the judge hire his or her own expert?  Who pays for that?  What if the judge’s expert is not all that he or she should be?

Fred Friendly Seminars, Inc. provides the editorial and logistical components of the "Judges As Gatekeepers" seminars. It is perhaps best known for the award-winning Fred Friendly Seminars broadcast nationally on PBS, as well as countless seminars for private audiences utilizing the Socratic Dialogue format developed and refined by Fred Friendly.  The producer of this seminar is Ruth Friendly. 

 

 

Page Last Modified on May 6, 1999 by Dan Fridman - Copyright 1999
All materials are the property of the Berkman Center for Internet & Society and Harvard Law School. 
Materials may be reproduced, distributed, or quoted as long as appropriate credit and citation is given.