[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Government takes more extreme lineinsecond"Eldred" case
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Government takes more extreme lineinsecond"Eldred" case
- From: "Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe(at)usg.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:05:46 -0600
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
What about works done as a work-for-hire, or with multiple authors?
What about those authored by a corporation? Do they only enter the
public domain if the company goes under?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 11:28 AM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] [openlaw] Government takes more extreme
> lineinsecond"Eldred" case
>
>
> Landes and Posner stated that
> "A point stressed in the
> legistive history of the 1976 act is that, by making the death of the
> author the determining date for copyright protection, "all of the
> authors works, including successive revisions of them would fall into
> the public domain at the same time, thus avoiding the present problems
> of determining a multiple of publication dates and
> distinguishing "old"
> from "new" matter in later editions."
>
> Now that's quite a straw man argument. All those bad old problems
> associated with putting a copyright date on works get solved
> by replacing
> that with the author's death which is something that
> everybody knows and
> can easily find out!Too bad they never heard of diff either!
>
>
>