[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Dmitry Sklyarov freed

At 13.52 -0800 01-12-13, Seth David Schoen wrote:
>Planet PDF and AP are reporting (Planet PDF has a complete press
>release) that the charges against Dmitry Sklyarov have been dropped
>and he will be allowed to return home to Russia.

December 13, 2001

        The United States Attorney's Office for the Northern District of
California announced  that Dmitry Sklyarov entered into an agreement this
morning with the United States and admitted his conduct in a hearing before
U.S. District Judge Whyte in San Jose Federal Court.

        Under the agreement, Mr. Sklyarov agreed to cooperate with the
United States in its ongoing prosecution of Mr. Sklyarov's former employer,
Elcomsoft Co., Ltd.  Mr. Skylarov will be required to appear at trial and
testify truthfully, and he will be deposed in the matter.  For its part, the
United States agreed to defer prosecution of Mr. Sklyarov until the
conclusion of the case against Elcomsoft or for one year, whichever is
longer.  Mr. Sklyarov will be permitted to return to Russia in the meantime,
but will be subject to the Court's supervision, including regularly
reporting by telephone to the Pretrial Services Department.  Mr. Sklyarov
will be prohibited from violating any laws during the year, including
copyright laws.  The United States agreed that, if Mr. Sklyarov successfully
completes the obligations in the agreement, it will dismiss the charges
pending against him at the end of the year or when the case against
Elcomsoft is complete.

        Mr. Sklyarov, 27, of Moscow, Russia, was indicted by a federal Grand
Jury on August 28, 2001.  He was charged with one count of conspiracy in
violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 371, and two counts of
trafficking for gain in technology primarily designed to circumvent
technology that protects a right of a copyright owner in violation of Title
17, United States Code, Section 1201(b)(1)(A), and two counts of trafficking
for gain in technology marketed for use in circumventing technology that
protects a right of a copyright owner in violation of Title 17, United
States Code, Section 1201(b)(1)(A).

        In entering into the agreement with the government, Mr. Sklyarov was
required to acknowledge his conduct in the offense.  In the agreement, Mr.
Sklyarov made the following admissions, which he also confirmed in federal
court today:

"Beginning on a date prior to June 20, 2001, and continuing through July 15,
2001, I was employed by the Russian software company, Elcomsoft Co. Ltd.
(also known as Elcom Ltd.) (hereinafter "Elcomsoft") as a computer
programmer and cryptanalyst. 

"Prior to June 20, 2001, I was aware Adobe Systems, Inc. ("Adobe") was a
software company in the United States.  I was also aware Adobe was the
creator of the Adobe Portable Document Format ("PDF"), a computer file
format for the publication and distribution of electronic documents.  Prior
to June 20, 2001, I knew Adobe distributed a program titled the Adobe
Acrobat eBook Reader that provided technology for the reading of documents
in an electronic format on personal computers.  Prior to June 20, 2001, I
was aware that documents distributed in the Adobe Acrobat eBook Reader
format are PDF files and that specifications of PDF allow for limiting of
certain operations, such as opening, editing, printing, or annotating.

"Prior to June 20, 2001, as a part of my dissertation work and as part of my
employment with Elcomsoft, I wrote a part of computer program titled the
Advanced eBook Processor ("AEBPR").  I developed AEBPR as a practical
application of my research for my dissertation and in order to demonstrate
weaknesses in protection methods of PDF files.   The only use of the AEBPR
is to create an unprotected copy of an electronic document.  Once a PDF file
is decrypted with the AEBPR, a copy is no longer protected by encryption. 
This is all the AEBPR program does.

"Prior to June 20, 2001, I believed that ElcomSoft planned to post the AEBPR
program on the Internet on the company's website www.elcomsoft.com.  I
believed that the company would charge a fee for a license for the full
version of the AEBPR that would allow access to all capabilities of the

"After Adobe released a new version of the Adobe Acrobat eBook Reader that
prevented the initial version of the AEBPR program from removing the
limitations or restrictions on an e-book, I wrote software revisions for a
new version of the AEBPR program. The new version again decrypted the
e-document to which it was applied.  The version of this new AEBPR program
offered on the Elcomsoft website only decrypted a portion of an e-document
to which it was applied, unless the user had already purchased a fully
functional version of the earlier version and had both versions installed on
the same machine.  The new version was developed after June 29, 2001. At
that time, Elcomsoft had already stopped selling the program. The version of
this new program offered on the Elcomsoft website did not provide a user
with an opportunity to purchase it or convert it to a fully functional one,
and was developed as a matter of competition.

"On July 15, 2001, as part of my employment with Elcomsoft, I attended the
DEF CON Nine conference in Las Vegas, Nevada.  At the conference I made a
presentation originally intended for the BlackHat conference that
immediately preceded the DefCon Nine in July 2001 in Las Vegas, Nevada.  The
same group of people organizes both BlackHat and DefCon Nine.  Since there
was no available slot for a presentation at BlackHat at the time when the
paper was sent for the committee consideration, the organizers of both
conferences suggested that the paper be presented at the DefCon rather than
at BlackHat.  The paper that I read at DefCon is attached as  Exhibit A.  A
principal part of my presentation is comprised of my research for the
dissertation.  In my presentation when I said "we", I meant Elcomsoft."

        Mr. Sklyarov's employer, Elcomsoft, remains charged in the case, and
the Court in that matter has set hearings for various motions on March 4,
2002, and April 1, 2002. 

        The prosecution of Elcomsoft is the result of an  investigation by
the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Scott Frewing and Joseph Sullivan of
the Computer Hacking and Intellectual Property ("CHIP") Unit are the
Assistant U.S. Attorneys who are prosecuting the case with the assistance of
legal technician Lauri Gomez. 

        A copy of this press release and key court documents filed in the
case may also be found on the U.S. Attorney's Office's website at
www.usdoj.gov/usao/can <http://www.usaondca.com>.

        All press inquiries to the U.S. Attorney's Office should be directed
to Assistant U.S. Attorney Matthew J. Jacobs at (415)436-7181 or Assistant
U.S. Attorney Ross Nadel, Chief of the CHIP Unit, in San Jose at (408


  ICQ:35638414                              mailto:mikael@pawlo.com
  +46-704-215825                              http://www.pawlo.com/