The Global Internet: Difference between revisions

From Internet Law Program 2011
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 28: Line 28:
* Court of Justice of the European Union Press Release: “Google has not infringed trade mark law by allowing advertisers to purchase keywords corresponding to their competitors’ trade marks,” available at http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2010-03/cp100032en.pdf
* Court of Justice of the European Union Press Release: “Google has not infringed trade mark law by allowing advertisers to purchase keywords corresponding to their competitors’ trade marks,” available at http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2010-03/cp100032en.pdf


===Law and Global Content Distribution===
 


==Recommended Readings==
==Recommended Readings==

Revision as of 15:59, 1 August 2011

iLaw Wiki Navigation
Pillar Themes of iLaw
Open Systems/Access · Online Liberty and FOE
The Changing Internet: Cybersecurity · Intellectual Property
Digital Humanities · Cooperation · Privacy
Cross-sectional Themes of iLaw
The History of the Internet
The Global Internet · Interoperability
The Study of the Internet: New Methods for New Technologies
The Future of the Internet
Case Studies
Digital Libraries, Archives, and Rights Registries
Exploring the Arab Spring · Minds for Sale
User Innovation · Mutual Aid
Misc
Program Schedule · Program Logistics
Evening Events · Student Projects · Participation
Old iLaw Videos · Mid-Point Check-in

Overview

Thursday, September 8, 1:30pm-2:30pm
Format: Lecture, featuring guest respondents
Leads: Herbert Burkert and Urs Gasser
Participants: Susan Crawford, Juan Carlos de Martin, Catharina Maranke, and others

In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy making—all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values.

Required Readings

Governance

Enforcement and User-created Content

Competition


Recommended Readings

The State of Online Business