The Global Internet: Difference between revisions
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Ilawsidebar}} | {{Ilawsidebar}} | ||
==Overview== | ==Overview== | ||
''[ | '''[[Program_Schedule#Thursday.2C_September_8.2C_2011|Thursday, September 8]], 1:30pm-2:30pm'''<br/> | ||
''Format'': Lecture, featuring guest respondents<br/> | ''Format'': Lecture, featuring guest respondents<br/> | ||
''Leads'': Herbert Burkert and Urs Gasser<br/> | ''Leads'': [http://www.law.harvard.edu/faculty/directory/index.html?id=964 Herbert Burkert] and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/ugasser Urs Gasser]<br/> | ||
''Participants'': Susan Crawford, Juan Carlos de Martin, Catharina Maranke, others | ''Participants'': [http://www.cardozo.yu.edu/MemberContentDisplay.aspx?ccmd=ContentDisplay&ucmd=UserDisplay&userid=228 Susan Crawford], [http://nexa.polito.it/directors Juan Carlos de Martin], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/cmaracke Catharina Maranke], and others | ||
In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy making—all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values. | In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy making—all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values. | ||
Revision as of 16:19, 30 July 2011
Overview
Thursday, September 8, 1:30pm-2:30pm
Format: Lecture, featuring guest respondents
Leads: Herbert Burkert and Urs Gasser
Participants: Susan Crawford, Juan Carlos de Martin, Catharina Maranke, and others
In the global online space, traditional legal frameworks, such as public international law and international private law, come together with new developments, such as evolving Internet law (focused on new regulations addressing international Internet issues), to create different models for, and forms of, digital governance. Processes and structures, such as online dispute resolution systems, Terms of Use policies, and other mechanisms also shape user activity and permissible behavior. Actions and interventions by private actors, NGOs, and international organizations, also exert control, by defining use and activity, permitting or denying access, and facilitating policy making—all with varying degrees of harmonization, conflict, and evolution. Through a series of case studies, the attributes, influence, and evolution of these mechanisms will be explored in the context of e-commerce, media and free expression, technical and organizational infrastructure, and other values.