Cyberlaw/Day 5: Difference between revisions

From Cyberlaw: Internet Points of Control Course Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 5: Line 5:
== University Filtering (group exercise) ==
== University Filtering (group exercise) ==


*General Counsel's perspective:
* IT/General Counsel's perspective:
** What is the minimum legal duty to satisfy the record companies?
** What is the minimum legal duty to satisfy the record companies?
** What technical interventions are possible?
** What technical interventions are possible?
*** Install speed bumps:
*** (1) Install speed bumps:
**** Block 'bad bits'. Reduce traffic in targeted areas.  
**** Block 'bad bits'. Reduce traffic in targeted areas.  
**** Block all bits. Result: it takes longer to download/upload the Daily Show.
**** Block all bits. Result: it takes longer to download/upload the Daily Show.
**** Target 'unusual' activity.
**** Target 'unusual' activity.
*** (2) Block certain [http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers ports] altogether.
* University Professor's perspective:
** 'Thank you for your letter. We've thought about it.'
** Worry that imposing these restrictions creates a slippery slope to other kinds of blocks: indecent, seditious, etc. Hard to draw this line between acceptable and anti-free speech blocking.

Revision as of 17:35, 8 January 2008

University Filtering (group exercise)

  • IT/General Counsel's perspective:
    • What is the minimum legal duty to satisfy the record companies?
    • What technical interventions are possible?
      • (1) Install speed bumps:
        • Block 'bad bits'. Reduce traffic in targeted areas.
        • Block all bits. Result: it takes longer to download/upload the Daily Show.
        • Target 'unusual' activity.
      • (2) Block certain ports altogether.
  • University Professor's perspective:
    • 'Thank you for your letter. We've thought about it.'
    • Worry that imposing these restrictions creates a slippery slope to other kinds of blocks: indecent, seditious, etc. Hard to draw this line between acceptable and anti-free speech blocking.