The Future of News: Difference between revisions

From The Internet: Issues at the Frontier (course wiki)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
* Columbia Journalism Review article: [http://www.cjr.org/feature/overload_1.php Overload!]- Journalism’s battle for relevance in an age of too much information
* Columbia Journalism Review article: [http://www.cjr.org/feature/overload_1.php Overload!]- Journalism’s battle for relevance in an age of too much information
* The [http://www.ap.org/newmodel.pdf AP report (PDF)] mentioned in Overload!
* The [http://www.ap.org/newmodel.pdf AP report (PDF)] mentioned in Overload!
* [http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/12/11/no-freaks/ a short introduction to the newspaper crisis on the Daily Show]
* [http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/12/11/no-freaks/ A short introduction to the newspaper crisis on the Daily Show]
* [http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/12/12/entrepreneurial-journalism-is-not-an-oxymoron/ Hey let's write some Journalistic Innovation grants... it works for Jeff Jarvis' class...]
* [http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/12/12/entrepreneurial-journalism-is-not-an-oxymoron/ Hey let's write some Journalistic Innovation grants... it works for Jeff Jarvis' class...]
* [http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2008/12/updating-the-pulitzer-prizes.html Online Pulitzers anyone?]
* [http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2008/12/updating-the-pulitzer-prizes.html Online Pulitzers anyone?]
*"But it was - and the Times pegs this more recently - a bubble, a false economy. If there was a golden age of newspapers, I say it was probably two to four decades before that, when cities had many papers, many voices, many views, and papers still spoke for and with the people.
* "It was - and the Times pegs this more recently - a bubble, a false economy. If there was a golden age of newspapers, I say it was probably two to four decades before that, when cities had many papers, many voices, many views, and papers still spoke for and with the people." Sound familiar? That’s where we’re headed again with the internet: many voices, many views, and now it’s the people talking." From [http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/12/10/poor-chicago/ Poor Chicago] by Jeff Jarvis"
Sound familiar? That’s where we’re headed again with the internet: many voices, many views, and now it’s the people talking." from [http://www.buzzmachine.com/2008/12/10/poor-chicago/ Poor Chicago] by Jeff Jarvis"
*[http://www.nytimes.com/marketing/timesextra/ Times Extra!] and some [http://www.mondaynote.com/2008/12/07/light-at-the-end-of-the-pure-player-tunnel-it%E2%80%99s-not-a-locomotive/ thoughts about it and other things]
*[http://www.nytimes.com/marketing/timesextra/ Times Extra!] and some [http://www.mondaynote.com/2008/12/07/light-at-the-end-of-the-pure-player-tunnel-it%E2%80%99s-not-a-locomotive/ thoughts about it and other things]
*[http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/12/twitter-gold-mine.html An add model based off of twitter?] How could this be applied to news?
*[http://radar.oreilly.com/2008/12/twitter-gold-mine.html An ad-model based off of twitter?] How could this be applied to news?
*for those of you who have never read online news[http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/10-things-every-newspaper-and-magazine-website-must-do/ 10 things every newspaper and magazine website must do]
* For those of you who have never read online news: [http://www.twistimage.com/blog/archives/10-things-every-newspaper-and-magazine-website-must-do/ 10 things every newspaper and magazine website must do]


==Possible tools==
==Possible tools==


Could we a discussion before, during and after the event using tools such as:
Could we have a discussion before, during and after the event using tools such as:


* [http://seesmic.com/ Seesmic]: allows video conversations.
* [http://seesmic.com/ Seesmic]: allows video conversations.

Revision as of 12:42, 15 December 2008

Topic owners: Dharmishta Rood, Jon Fildes

back to syllabus

Precis

Summary

The traditional media industry is in turmoil. Circulation of newspapers is falling. Some, such as the Tribune group, are saddled with huge debts and have filed for bankruptcy. Staff are being laid off, costs are being cut and foreign bureaus are being shut. Audiences are fragmenting, advertising spending is plummeting and the valuations of companies is dropping. TV and radio are experiencing similar problems. Some papers have even experimented with outsourcing local news reporting to India!

Most of these changes have been blamed on the arrival of the web, which has changed how information is produced and consumed. Now, anyone can be a news gatherer, publisher and distributor. The balance of power has changed. Yet at the same time there is a paradox; the web offers organisations a huge opportunity to reach out to audiences and connect with them in new ways.

This class will seek to explore at least two of the challenges currently facing the media industry:

  • What will the business model of the future look like? As Richard Sambrook , Director of the BBC's Global News division, says: “Newspapers and broadcasters have lived for decades by selling audiences to advertisers. Now the number of eyeballs per page or per programme is falling - but we have much greater detail and granularity about where they are going and what they are doing online. Media organisations have to find a way to extract the commercial value from that”. Already, groups such as spot.us and Pro Publica are experimenting with new business models. Others, such as the Christian Science Monitor, have ditched the old way of doing things and have gone entirely online. Will these work? Are these the right approach?
  • What will the newspapers or media outlets of the future look like? The New York Times is using its website in new and innovative ways. Other experiments papers have been less successful. So, how should papers engage with their audience? Is news reporting now a collaborative process? How should they respond to citizen journalism? Are they competing or should they - and can they - work together?

This class will explore some of the issues facing the future of the news industry. Could they disappear? Does it matter if they do? What values are at stake beyond what the markets appear to be able to sustain? Should governments intervene to save them in the same way as they have decided to prop up the ailing car manufacturing industry? Is this an appropriate intervention? Should it be left to market forces? Ultimately, what is the future for “old media”?

Concrete Question of the Week

Possible contributors

Possible readings

Possible tools

Could we have a discussion before, during and after the event using tools such as:

  • Seesmic: allows video conversations.
  • Phreadz: allows threaded multimedia conversations using video, images, text, audio or links. (Currently in closed Beta but we can ask for accounts)
Looks fantastic. Perhaps of most interest would be to bring in someone from a paper who is currently struggling with this and talk it through, along with a policy proposal or two. I think someone from the New Republic just proposed a new "federal writers" program to save journalists (!), harkening back to a similar program during the 30's that encouraged people (some of whom would later become famous writers) to collect oral histories of various regions and subcultures of the US. JZ 16:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)