Syllabus: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 15:46, 1 June 2009

In the order per the schedule on the first day of seminar (the schedule lives here):

Free and Open Source Software

Topic Owners: dulles,Ayelet

The Internet and Societal Inequity

Topic Owners: Mark, Graham

Old Laws/New Media

Topic Owners: Debbie Rosenbaum, Matt Sanchez

All Together Now For Great Justice Dot Org

Topic Owners: Rainer + Elana + Mchua

The Future of News

Topic owners: User:Drood, User:jf

The Future of Copyright and Entertainment

Topic owners: Joe, Miriam

The Google Book Search Settlement

Topic Owners: Gwen, Lee, Jon

Anonymity and privacy

Topic Owners: Dan Ray, Conor, Joshua

Internet + Industry + Investing

Topic owners: Andrew Klaber and DAL Internet, Industry, and Investing

Internet Governance and Regulation

Topic owners: Vera, Arjun

Prediction Markets

Topic Owners: Matthew, Elisabeth

The Tools Team

Topic Owners: Jason + Michelle

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-== The Future of Copyright and Entertainment ==
+In the order per the schedule on the first day of seminar (the schedule lives [[Scheduling|here]]):
-* Alternative compensation and consumption models (Terry Fisher/Noank, anystreet, imeem, hulu, tip jars, the MPAA deal, girl talk; Gray Tuesday/downhill battle)
-* RIAA case against individual file sharers as a strategic move
-* Comparative/int’l angles
-==== Changing trends in Consumption & Creation of Music and other Performance Art====
+== Free and Open Source Software ==
+[[Free and Open Source Software]]
-'''Presenters:''' ''Joe Fishman, Miriam Weiler'' (perhaps there is some possibility of collaboration with those working on the Tenenbaum suit?)
+'''Topic Owners:  [[User:dulles|dulles]]''','''[[User:Ayelet|Ayelet]]'''
-===== Alternatives to iTunes for Access to Copyrighted Works =====
+== The Internet and Societal Inequity ==
+[[The Internet and Societal Inequity]]
-We are beginning to see more and more choices for where and how to get copyrighted music.  Gone are the days when it was either download illegally on programs such as Limewire or pay for them on iTunes.  There have been attempts at creating new marketplaces from scratch such as at [http://amiestreet.com Aimee Street], which lowers the cost of discovering new music by setting price according to download popularity. Then there has been [http://grooveshark.com Grooveshark], which charges for downloads from its user-uploaded library but actually gives a cut to the original uploader.  And then we find the advertisement-driven revenue model creeping in, such as at [http://www.imeem.com Imeem], the third-most popular social networking site on the Internet as of August (behind only facebook and MySpace).
+'''Topic Owners:'''  '''[[User:Megerman|Mark]]''', '''[[User:G|Graham]]'''
-It's clear that the days of CD browsing at Tower Records are behind us.  And while iTunes has been the one primarily filling the vacuum, the proliferation of web-based alternatives is making things interesting.  Are any of these models likely to succeed?  Are our methods of music consumption likely to have an impact on our methods of music production? And just where does the recording industry fit in to all of it?
+== Old Laws/New Media ==
-:Maybe John Buckman, from Magnatune?
+[[Old Laws/New Media]]
-:Not sure how to integrate Fan Culture & Vidding into a broader discussion of changing consumption patterns of music?
+'''Topic Owners:  [[User:DebbieRosenbaum|Debbie Rosenbaum]], [[User:MSanchez|Matt Sanchez]]'''
+== All Together Now For Great Justice Dot Org ==
+[[All Together Now For Great Justice Dot Org]]
-==== Old Laws/New Media ====
+'''Topic Owners:'''  '''[[User:Hoellra|Rainer]]''' + [[User:Elanaberkowitz|'''Elana''']] + '''[[User:Mchua|Mchua]]'''
-Shubham Mukherjee, Debbie Rosenbaum, and Matt Sanchez (as noted above, collaboration with the "Changing Trends..." group? Are these separate topics warranting their own respective days?
+== The Future of News ==
+[[The Future of News]]
-How has new media affected traditional communications and media industries and challenged traditional law?  How do we deal with the fact that there is little legal infrastructure that takes into account today's new media environments?  Do we apply old laws to new technologies, or do we create new regulations?  How can we create sound policy that aligns with both traditional legal and moral aspirations while according with today's technological realities?
+Topic owners: [[User:Drood]], [[User:jf]]
-This topic will aim to explore these general questions through the specific example of Sony BMG v. Tenenbaum, a federal file-sharing case the three of us are working on with Professor Charles Nesson, co-founder of the Berkman Center.
+== The Future of Copyright and Entertainment ==
+[[The Future of Copyright and Entertainment]]
-Speaker Ideas: Google Telecom Lawyer Rick Whitt or Google Antitrust lawyer Dana Wagner.
-== The Internet and Publication ==
+''Topic owners:'' ''[[User:Jfishman|Joe]], [[User:Miriam|Miriam]]''
-'''Presenters:  [[User:Gwen|Gwen]], [[User:Lbaker|Lee]], [[User:Cooper|Jon]]'''
-The internet has completely changed the meaning of publication, and the relationship between print and digital media is continually evolving.  The advent of the personal computer and the internet have changed the way information is assembled, distributed, managed, and digested in ways at least as dramatic and consequential as the advent of the printing press.  How are traditional publishers coping with these changes?  What new forms of publishing are made possible by the internet, and what challenges do they entail? --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 16:34, 1 December 2008 (EST)
+== The Google Book Search Settlement ==
+[[The Google Book Search Settlement]]
-=== The Publication Process ===
+'''Topic Owners:  [[User:Gwen|Gwen]], [[User:Lbaker|Lee]], [[User:Cooper|Jon]]'''
-==== Open Access Publishing ====
+== Anonymity and privacy ==
+[[Anonymity and privacy]]
-Addressing whether there actually seems to be a movement toward this model, and away from traditional science/tech publishing.  What effects movement toward this model might have on quality, oversight, etc. of published articles.  Also, discussion of business models/funding, problems with open access models, etc.  And any copyright issues (to tie things back to law).
+'''Topic Owners: [[User:Danray|Dan Ray]]''', '''[[User:CKennedy|Conor]]''', '''[[User:Jgruensp|Joshua]]'''
-This can relate both to open access of full articles (as with [http://www.plos.org/ PLoS]) or single experiments/results (including [http://sciencecommons.org/ Science Commons] and like projects to both make the data available, and, perhaps more importantly, the technologies to make it available in usable form)
+== Internet + Industry + Investing ==
-Would "open review" (instead of "peer review") work? Are there any models around? What about a Slashdot-style system of moderation and meta-moderation?
+Topic owners: Andrew Klaber and DAL
+[[Internet, Industry, and Investing]]
-Yes, there is at least one example that I can think of.  Lawrence Lessig published the first edition of his book Code in 1999.  It came out in paper and ink.  Several years later, in order to "translate" (his word) the book into a second edition, Lessig persuaded the publisher (Basic Books) to allow him to post the entire text of the first edition of the book on a wiki hosted by Jotspot.  (The Wiki text was licensed under a Creative Commons  Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License.)  Lessig explains, "a team of 'chapter captains' helped facilitate a conversation about the text.  There were some edits to the text itself, and many more valuable comments and criticisms.  I then took that text as of the end of 2005 and added my own edits to produce this book." (Preface to ''Code version 2.0'', x.)  ''Code version 2.0'' is the result of this collaborative editing process.  It is available for purchase in paper and ink, for free as a [http://pdf.codev2.cc/Lessig-Codev2.pdf PDF download], and also on a [http://www.socialtext.net/codev2/index.cgi wiki] hosted by Socialtext. --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 15:45, 1 December 2008 (EST)
+== Internet Governance and Regulation ==
+[[Internet Governance and Regulation]]
-==== Collaborative and Customized Textbooks ====
+'''Topic owners: [[User:Bepa|Vera]]''', '''[[User: AMehra|Arjun]]'''
-Maybe also Harvard's new open access policy for academic work?
-(note that the Harvard Free Culture group is working on the matter - see [http://wiki.freeculture.org/Open_University_Campaign The Weeler Declaration])
-JZ described an innovative publication option with which Foundation Press seems willing to experiment:  essentially, individual chapters are available independently from one another, giving instructors the freedom to custom build a text book that contains exactly their desired materials (no more, and no less), in the desired sequence.  Assuming this model is technologically, legally, and financially feasible, what benefits and drawbacks does it entail?  Possible risks might include a lack of completeness and/or organization in the materials ultimately acquired by students as well as the possibility that pedagogical emphasis is dictated by sociologically driven group trends rather than deliberately thoughtful decision making.  --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 15:57, 1 December 2008 (EST)
-==== Self Publication ====
-One of the biggest and most obvious changes wrought by the advent of the internet and PCs the ability of individuals to self-publish; it is now cheap, quick, and easy to reach a mass audience with one's own text, images, and sounds.  The rise of blogging, Youtube, and other developments have further increased the ease of self-publication.  I know that several scholars have studied the rise and impact of self publication opportunities, but I'm not sure what conclusions they've drawn or which of them might be interesting to bring in as a guest.  Suggestions? --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 16:09, 1 December 2008 (EST)
-=== The Relationship Between Print and Digital Media ===
-==== Google Book Search ====
-What does the [http://www.authorsguild.org/advocacy/articles/settlement-resources.html recent settlement] between Google and the Authors Guild/American Association of Publishers regarding online accessibility of digitalized books mean?  Many have hailed it for both improving access to knowledge by creating [http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/opinion/30gleick.html?em "the long dreamed of universal library"] and for avoiding a judicial resolution that might have exposed antiquated aspects of US copyright law.  But there may also be troubling aspects of having access to such a large and unique collection of content controlled by a single for-profit company (the agreement is non-exclusive to Google, but it may be  difficult for a legitimate competitor to emerge, given Google's sizable first mover advantage).
-Is this settlement optimal for all interested groups?  Presumably it is for Google and the Authors Guild/AAP, but what about externalities for non-parties, such as the reading public?  Is some sort of government intervention appropriate to ensure access to this "universal library"?  What difference does it make, if any, that this "universal library" is operated by a private company reliant on many [http://www.google.com/googlebooks/partners.html public university libraries?]
-==== The Shifting Role of Publishing Companies ====
-As noted above under "Self Publication," the internet makes it very easy for individuals to make their work widely available.  However, actually garnering a sizable audience or realizing a profit from one's work remains a greater challenge; it appears to be with respect to this step that the services of traditional publishers appear to retain some value.  After all, publishing companies offer marketing channels and name recognition in addition to simply machines that print a books.  Are traditional publishing companies threatened by the new forms of publishing that the internet makes possible?  Are publishers better off battling the internet (for example, by emphasizing the superiority and reliability of their traditional services) or embracing it (for example, by offering digital and internet-based publication services)? --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 16:16, 1 December 2008 (EST)  Should the latter services and items -- such as ebooks, audiobooks in mp3 format, and Amazon Kindle -- be replacements for or compliments to printed books?  --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 07:32, 2 December 2008 (EST)
-==== The Fate of Printed Materials ====
-Will the internet cause the use of printed materials to decline to the point that printed materials become obsolete?  Obsolescence is reality in my own experience with The ''Harvard Journal of Law and Technology'' (''JOLT''). ''JOLT'' publishes its articles online on its [http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/ website], and it also publishes shorter and more timely posts online in its companion, the [http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/ JOLT Digest].  In addition to being available directly to any internet user, all ''JOLT'' articles are made available through legal research databases, including Westlaw and Lexis.  Each semester, we order from our publisher (Hein) enormous boxes of the new issue in print, but we have no idea what to do with them.  Even after giving away copies to our parents, there are still stacks and stacks of unwanted and unneeded paper copies, and a lighthearted dialogue about what to do with them has steadily taken over the dry erase board in our office.  These printed copies of our journal are literally useless. --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 16:32, 1 December 2008 (EST)
-The way that readers encounter and digest information is vastly different in the context of printed materials and in the context of digital and online materials.  These differences have consequences for both academic researchers and regular citizens in terms of both the kind of information an individual is exposed to and the way that the individual approaches those sources.  If a dramatic shift away from printed media is happening, what other shifts does that entail for the way that people learn, synthesize, and evaluate information? --[[User:Gwen|Gwen]] 16:45, 1 December 2008 (EST)
-We talked about an [http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200807/google interesting article] relating to the topic of how digital media and the internet are affecting the way in which people read in JZ's 1L reading group.  The article relates more to how the presentation of written material on the 'net (short and skimmable, links galore, etc.) is affecting the way we process information and our ability to read "long" pieces (ie. more than a page or so) without becoming distracted.  It is a bit tangential to the specific discussion of the movement of print media onto digital form (since it mostly discusses the ''differences'' between the format of media in each of the forms), but is interesting regardless. [[User:Lbaker|Lbaker]] 08:55, 2 December 2008 (EST)
-=== Possible Guests ===
-* Google book digitization people and/or members of the authors guild
-* Amazon Kindle people
-* People from publishing companies doing offering innovative services, products, or editing processes involving the internet. (Does anybody know of such companies?)
-* Someone who has studied self publication on the internet (names?)
-* Someone who has studied reading habits in conjunction with the shift away from printed media (names?)
-* Lessig? (he is probably more useful for a different topic)
-== Free and Open Source Software ==
-'''Presenters:  [[dulles]]''','''[[User:Ayelet|Ayelet]]''' (Maybe)
-How can a dispersed, multilingual collection of coders working for free assemble something as complicated as a web browser, let alone an entire operating system? Open-source projects are famously free-wheeling, but different organizational models and tools have sprung up to solve these obstacles.
+== Prediction Markets ==
+[[Prediction Markets]]
-What are the forces that drive hackers to contribute to open source projects? What, if anything, can we learn from applying theories of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gift_economy gift economies] to open source projects? Should we read Lewis Hyde's [http://southerncrossreview.org/4/schwartz.html The Gift]? (n.b. i may be motivated by my own desire to read the book -- [[dulles]])
+'''Topic Owners:'''  '''[[User:Mwansley|Matthew]]''', '''[[User:EST|Elisabeth]]'''
-* Eric Raymond/OSI ?
+== The Tools Team ==
-* PJ/Groklaw
+[[The Tools Team]]
-* Strategies and indemnities (e.g. SCO v. IBM)
-* Questioning the foundations of the free software movement (i.e. the "four freedoms")[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_software#cite_ref-bull6_3-0] -- how much does access to the source code really matter anymore?  Are there alternative theories (e.g. "generativity") that better capture the values at stake? Affero License? (Eben Moglen?)
-* The organization/groups/cooperation questions: how do free software projects organize and govern themselves, and what broader lessons might be learned from it?  (e.g. debian, IETF)
-(This marks my initial claim to the topic, though I would be overjoyed to work with others - [[dulles]])
+'''Topic Owners:''' [[User:Jharrow|Jason]] + [[User:Mahmadian.jd11|Michelle]]