[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.

To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:29:18 +0200
In-reply-to: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC01239608@mail.onetouch.com>; from hartman@onetouch.com on Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:53:46AM -0700
References: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC01239608@mail.onetouch.com>
Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:53:46AM -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
> I thought that CSS was the Content Scrambling System
> ... that is, that CSS was _only_ the encryption portion
> of the "three pronged approach".

I wouldn't think so, considering that the CSS license is about quite a
few things that have nothing whatsoever to do with technical or legal
details of encryption.


-- 
New GPG Key issued (old key expired):
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub  1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
     Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4  29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5

References:
- RE: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
  - From: Richard Hartman <hartman@onetouch.com>

Prev by Date: Re: [dvd-discuss] Extending copyright discourages the creation ofnew works.
Next by Date: [dvd-discuss] Eldred Amicus
Previous by thread: RE: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
Next by thread: RE: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread