[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 10:53:46 -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I thought that CSS was the Content Scrambling System
... that is, that CSS was _only_ the encryption portion
of the "three pronged approach".
--
-Richard M. Hartman
hartman@onetouch.com
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom [mailto:tom@lemuria.org]
> Sent: Friday, May 24, 2002 10:12 AM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
>
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 09:24:24AM -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > > - decss reads DVDs regardless of region coding
> >
> > The region coding is not part of the encryption.
>
> no, but it IS part of CSS. remember that - see WTO lecture - CSS is a
> "three-pronged approach". not even the MPAA believed that the
> encryption would be any good.
>
>
> --
> New GPG Key issued (old key expired):
> http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
> pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <tom@lemuria.org>
> Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01
> 9FA1 2D7A 04F5
>