[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''
- From: Jeremy Erwin <jerwin(at)ponymail.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 14:00:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <OF40E18A16.BAA8AB07-ON88256BA7.0060FE44@aero.org>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Friday, April 26, 2002, at 01:41 PM, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
> So...is this an argument that the headers constitute access control? As
> the two bytes in a font file are claimed to be? Or the don't read me
> bit?
>
> BTW - I'd say the "irreparable damage" was done in 1997
>
And, again in 1998. The owner of www.cow.net changed his site again.
While
http://www.cow.net/spilledmilk/sara.txt contains the original story...
It is posted as
From: Sara Glover <viv@charm.net>
Subject: FIRST STORY: Vivian's Vow
Date: 1998/10/06
<bad writing follows>
It also contains a reply
From: RosyB.Goode@super.zippo.com (Rosy B. Goode)
Subject: Re: A Little De-lurk
Date: 1997/04/28
indicating that the piece of fiction was posted not once, but twice.
When I first investigated the site in question, the fiction was
posted as dating from April, 1997.
Mind games...
Jeremy