[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''
- From: Jeremy Erwin <jerwin(at)ponymail.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:58:16 -0400
- In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204251107210.6820-100000@qwe3.math.cmu.edu>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Thursday, April 25, 2002, at 11:26 AM, Scott A Crosby wrote:
> But seriously, what next? Google (and other search engines) won't be
> able
> to survive these incessent letters, if anyone gets into their mind that
> they can make the past dissapear at their whim. (How many people have
> old
> usenet posts, mailing list flames, or mirrored copies of embarassing
> webpages they wish would go away?)
The thread surrounding the "Vivian's Vow" vignette is intact, but the
actual story seems to be missing. (Google Groups does allow users to
remove old posts)) Nor is it available at asstr.org, but that's not
surprising, as alt.sex.spanking is not archived there. The owner of the
web page http://www.cow.net/cows seems to have a rather low opinion of
his "ex girlfriends", and it would not surprise me if some google
bombing techniques were used to boost the score of the page in question.
usenet erotica, however poorly written, tends not to be confined to a
single, original posting