Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''

[microlenz(at)earthlink.net]

Look if works in the public domain can have copyright restored why can't 
Vivian..or rather Sara? Now that she may have gotten over her desires...or 
whatever...now she can use copyright to censor the past...or her past...what a 
concept!

On 25 Apr 2002 at 15:58, Jeremy Erwin wrote:

Date sent:      	Thu, 25 Apr 2002 15:58:16 -0400
Subject:        	Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''
From:           	Jeremy Erwin <jerwin@ponymail.com>
To:             	dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
Send reply to:  	dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu

> 
> On Thursday, April 25, 2002, at 11:26  AM, Scott A Crosby wrote:
> 
> > But seriously, what next? Google (and other search engines) won't be 
> > able
> > to survive these incessent letters, if anyone gets into their mind that
> > they can make the past dissapear at their whim. (How many people have 
> > old
> > usenet posts, mailing list flames, or mirrored copies of embarassing
> > webpages they wish would go away?)
> 
> The thread surrounding the "Vivian's Vow" vignette is intact, but the 
> actual story seems to be missing. (Google Groups does allow users to 
> remove old posts)) Nor is it available at asstr.org, but that's not 
> surprising, as alt.sex.spanking is not archived there. The owner of the 
> web page http://www.cow.net/cows seems to have a rather low opinion of 
> his "ex girlfriends", and it would not surprise me if some google 
> bombing techniques were used to boost the score of the page in question.
> 
> usenet erotica, however poorly written, tends not to be confined to a 
> single, original posting
>