[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Must Copyright terms be uniform?
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Must Copyright terms be uniform?
- From: John Galt <galt(at)inconnu.isu.edu>
- Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2001 10:45:21 -0700 (MST)
- In-Reply-To: <OFB449EAA1.5C64236E-ON88256AFD.00558FBC@aero.org>
- Mail-Followup-To: galt@inconnu.isu.edu
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Even better: we could hit two birds with one stone. Fees for renewing
copyright dependent on Author's cut, with a provision in there that no fee
means no extension, for "de minimus non curat lex" :)
On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Michael A Rolenz wrote:
>You don't know Hollywierd accounting.....nothing ever makes a profit
>there....any fee scheme must be uniform and not dictated by the vagueries
>of accounting schemes.
>
>
>
>
>"Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe@usg.com>
>Sent by: owner-dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
>11/07/01 07:22 AM
>Please respond to dvd-discuss
>
>
> To: "'dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu>
> cc:
> Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Must Copyright terms be uniform?
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Arnold G. Reinhold [mailto:reinhold@world.std.com]
>> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Must Copyright terms be uniform?
>>
>> I think one could get the same effect by requiring affirmative action
>> to renew a copyright, like we had 50 years ago. I would have been
>> more comfortable with all the copyright duration extensions if there
>> was a substantial fee (say $100/yr) required to extend a term. Highly
>> valuable copyrights (Mickey Mouse, Gone With the Wind, etc.) would
>> see their terms lengthened, but the vast majority of material would
>> enter the public domain much sooner.
>>
>Interesting thought -- why not make the fee something like 1% of revenue
>generated but the work? (only applying this to extensions beyond some
>reasonable base term (20 yrs?)) That way, even if they don't become
>public domain, the works can still serve some public interest.
>
>-Charles Ballowe
>
>
>
--
You have paid nothing for the preceding, therefore it's worth every penny
you've paid for it: if you did pay for it, might I remind you of the
immortal words of Phineas Taylor Barnum regarding fools and money?
Who is John Galt? galt@inconnu.isu.edu, that's who!