[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Diebold uses DMCA to suppress embarrassing memos
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Diebold uses DMCA to suppress embarrassing memos
- From: "Richard Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 08:33:41 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Thread-index: AcOgFEpgFcBp9F7gQGmdUbBPdvBMRgCFAhEw
- Thread-topic: [dvd-discuss] Diebold uses DMCA to suppress embarrassing memos
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Neu [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 5:04 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Diebold uses DMCA to suppress embarrassing
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 03:06:01PM -0800, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > I presume the protection mechanism is there to
> > protect the votes.
> > Votes are _facts_, and therefore not subject
> > to copyright.
> I think if the recorded votes were facts, they would not be
> in such hot
> water right now... Much of the controversy is based on the suspected
> voter fraud. Assuming voter fraud has taken place, the votes
> would be a
> work of fiction fixed in tangible form, and would receive copyright
> protection. Right?
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!