[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[dvd-discuss] Re: DMCA Twist
- To: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Subject: [dvd-discuss] Re: DMCA Twist
- From: Scott A Crosby <scrosby(at)cs.rice.edu>
- Date: 29 Aug 2002 21:58:41 -0500
- Cc: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>, C-FIT_Community(at)realmeasures.dyndns.org, C-FIT_Release_Community(at)realmeasures.dyndns.org, DMCA_Discuss(at)lists.microshaft.org, fairuse-discuss(at)mrbrklyn.com, owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- In-reply-to: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC01239790@mail.onetouch.com>
- Organization: Rice University
- References: <E06ADA0073926048AD304115DD8AB6BC01239790@mail.onetouch.com>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp)
On Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:52:46 -0700, Richard Hartman <hartman@onetouch.com> writes:
> Reverse engineering may still be legal ... but
> applying what you learn from that is no longer
> legal if what you learn is how to bypass some
> form of protection that you reverse engineered.
Why use their words?
s/protection/control/
Scott