[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Copyright ranges
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Copyright ranges
- From: Jeremy Erwin <jerwin(at)ponymail.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 03:36:12 -0400
- In-reply-to: <ant0905056d2RsLo@vesuvio.armware>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Friday, August 9, 2002, at 01:31 AM, Thomas Olsson wrote:
> In article <FAEDD1DF-AB01-11D6-88ED-003065F24232@ponymail.com>, Jeremy
> Erwin
> <URL:mailto:jerwin@ponymail.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday, August 8, 2002, at 12:54 PM, Thomas Olsson wrote:
>> [snip]
>>
>> I think the Feist standard should apply. In the case of your poem
>> generator, the output is apparently random. In the case of Google, the
>> output is the result of various algorithms based on references from
>> other sites.
>
> But it is not random. For any given URL you get the same poem every
> time,
> as if you were retrieving a file by name.
>
How's the next poem link generated?
BTW, several URLs link to themselves via "Next Poem".