[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] The 2nd Front
- To: dvd-discuss(at)lweb.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] The 2nd Front
- From: Michael Rolenz <microlenz(at)earthlink.net>
- Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:35:47 -0400
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0112162328210.19186-100000@qwe3.math.cmu.edu>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
That's the whole problem with adding the 5 magic words to the DMCA. Copyright
infringement is already illegal. That you circumvented copy protection just adds
an additional charge - copyright infringement 5yrs in jail. Circumvention - life
+99yrs solitary confignment.
Scott A Crosby wrote:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Jim Bauer wrote:
>
> > [No person shall circumvent a technological measure for the purpose
> > of copyright infringement that effectively controls access to a work
> > protected under this title. The prohibition contained in the
> > preceding sentence shall take effect at the end of the 2-year
> > period beginning on the date of the enactment of this chapter. ]
> >
>
> Huh... Copyright infringement is already illegal. What does this clause
> do?
>
> Thats like saying that 'threatening someone with a plastic knife for
> purposes of robbery is illegal', when the act of robbery itself is already
> illegal, and has been for decades.
>
> Scott