OT: RE: [dvd-discuss] Welcome to the world of 'Fahrenheit 451'

["Ballowe, Charles" <CBallowe(at)usg.com>]

Sometimes, as much information is provided by what dissappears as
by what is already there. To avoid that kind of leak, plenty of
chaff needs to be thrown into the bunch. While I don't like the idea
of pulling information, it is pretty easy to see that an overbroad 
sweep is less telling than very specific pulling. (Whether the ones
who issued the order understand this is a different question.)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:Michael.A.Rolenz@aero.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 3:41 PM
> To: dvd-discuss@eon.law.harvard.edu
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Welcome to the world of 'Fahrenheit 451'
> 
> 
> The problem with that approach is that it is based upon POTENTIAL 
> sensitive information. They need to determine what IS sensitive and 
> protect that. Protecting the rest is a waste of time and 
> resources and 
> leads ultimately to the compromise of what truly is sensitive.
>