Intentcasting: Difference between revisions
(Added a scenario) |
(Minor edits, mostly adding commas and gendering the customer as female.) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Intentcasting is a way of issuing a [[Personal RFP]] that says, for example, | Intentcasting is a way of issuing a [[Personal RFP]]† -- an intentcast -- that says, for example, | ||
* "I need a stroller for twins in Glasgow in the next three hours." | * "I need a stroller for twins in Glasgow in the next three hours." | ||
* "I need a | * "I need a laptop power supply near SFO this afternoon." | ||
* "I need to rent a minivan that seats six and has a roof rack in Salt Lake City next week." | * "I need to rent a minivan that seats six and has a roof rack in Salt Lake City next week." | ||
* "I need wheel rims for a 1967 Peugeot 404." | * "I need wheel rims for a 1967 Peugeot 404." | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* "Here's a QR/barcode/photo of the boots I want in size 9E. Who can get them to me by tomorrow — without knowing yet who I am, while also knowing that I'm for real?" | * "Here's a QR/barcode/photo of the boots I want in size 9E. Who can get them to me by tomorrow — without knowing yet who I am, while also knowing that I'm for real?" | ||
Think of these as examples of how demand advertises to supply, rather than vice versa. It requires no guesswork about what the customer wants, or whether there is money on the table. The customer appears to the seller as a qualified lead, but not (unless she so chooses) as a target for future marketing | Think of these as examples of how demand advertises to supply, rather than vice versa. It requires no guesswork about what the customer wants, or whether there is money on the table. The customer appears to the seller as a qualified lead, but not (unless she so chooses) as a target for future marketing. Ideally the intentcast carries terms the customer proffers, and to which the seller or intermediary must agree. (See [https://cyber.law.harvard.edu/projectvrm/EmanciTerm EmanciTerm].) | ||
[[ | The customer can also provide a sum she is willing to pay. She should be able to do this in a way that is secure and involves minimal disclosure of personal information. If the sum is escrowed at a bank or other institution as earnest ready-to-pay money on the table, that should be possible as well. More about this is covered on the [[EmanciPay]] page. | ||
There are many ways this can be done now, through non-substitutable websites and services. Craigs List and eBay both provide means for requesting products. Twitter does too. And [http://www.etsy.com/alchemy/ Etsy]. | |||
But in a networked marketplace, we should not be limited only to what siloed services or sellers' intermediaries or marketing assistants provide. Intentcasting services operate as [[Fourth parties]] (working on the buyer's behalf, rather than the seller's, or any group of sellers), provide the security, selective disclosure, tracking, audit-ability and accountability that the customer might not have on her own. They can also note (and signal appropriately) loyalty, banking, shipping, and other relationships the customer might have with sellers and other relevant parties in the market. | |||
To make intentcasting a true category, services should be substitutable. | |||
As matters currently stand, there is an enormous sum of demand -- such as the RFPs mentioned above -- that can result in MLOTT (Money Left On The Table) if the supply side fails to hear the demand and complete a sale. As of today, there is no equivalent of the RFP, RFI, or RFQ for individuals in the open marketplace. Yet demand exists. Money is there. What we need is the table. | |||
That table is a set of protocols, rituals, systems, and services for routing requests from demand to supply, and responses back. Setting up that table is a primary challenge for VRM, and one addressed by a number of companies and projects on the [[VRM Development Work]] page. | |||
How intentcasting might work in a future decade is described in "[http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444873204577535352521092154.html The Customer as a God], the VRM cover essay in the 20 July 2012 [http://wsj.com Wall Street Journal] Review section. | |||
[http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/projectvrm/VRM_Development_Work#Intentcasting Here is a list of intentcasting providers] on [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/projectvrm/VRM_Development_Work the ProjectVRM Development Work list]. | |||
_____________ | |||
†In March 2009, when we first came up with this idea, we called it a [[Personal RFP]]. In November 2009, Scott Adams came up with a similar idea [http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/hunter_becomes_the_prey/ he called "broadcast shopping"]. |
Latest revision as of 23:09, 31 May 2023
Intentcasting is a way of issuing a Personal RFP† -- an intentcast -- that says, for example,
- "I need a stroller for twins in Glasgow in the next three hours."
- "I need a laptop power supply near SFO this afternoon."
- "I need to rent a minivan that seats six and has a roof rack in Salt Lake City next week."
- "I need wheel rims for a 1967 Peugeot 404."
- "I need a 200 watt 220-110 volt power converter in Copenhagen this afternoon"
- "Here's a QR/barcode/photo of the boots I want in size 9E. Who can get them to me by tomorrow — without knowing yet who I am, while also knowing that I'm for real?"
Think of these as examples of how demand advertises to supply, rather than vice versa. It requires no guesswork about what the customer wants, or whether there is money on the table. The customer appears to the seller as a qualified lead, but not (unless she so chooses) as a target for future marketing. Ideally the intentcast carries terms the customer proffers, and to which the seller or intermediary must agree. (See EmanciTerm.)
The customer can also provide a sum she is willing to pay. She should be able to do this in a way that is secure and involves minimal disclosure of personal information. If the sum is escrowed at a bank or other institution as earnest ready-to-pay money on the table, that should be possible as well. More about this is covered on the EmanciPay page.
There are many ways this can be done now, through non-substitutable websites and services. Craigs List and eBay both provide means for requesting products. Twitter does too. And Etsy.
But in a networked marketplace, we should not be limited only to what siloed services or sellers' intermediaries or marketing assistants provide. Intentcasting services operate as Fourth parties (working on the buyer's behalf, rather than the seller's, or any group of sellers), provide the security, selective disclosure, tracking, audit-ability and accountability that the customer might not have on her own. They can also note (and signal appropriately) loyalty, banking, shipping, and other relationships the customer might have with sellers and other relevant parties in the market.
To make intentcasting a true category, services should be substitutable.
As matters currently stand, there is an enormous sum of demand -- such as the RFPs mentioned above -- that can result in MLOTT (Money Left On The Table) if the supply side fails to hear the demand and complete a sale. As of today, there is no equivalent of the RFP, RFI, or RFQ for individuals in the open marketplace. Yet demand exists. Money is there. What we need is the table.
That table is a set of protocols, rituals, systems, and services for routing requests from demand to supply, and responses back. Setting up that table is a primary challenge for VRM, and one addressed by a number of companies and projects on the VRM Development Work page.
How intentcasting might work in a future decade is described in "The Customer as a God, the VRM cover essay in the 20 July 2012 Wall Street Journal Review section.
Here is a list of intentcasting providers on the ProjectVRM Development Work list.
_____________
†In March 2009, when we first came up with this idea, we called it a Personal RFP. In November 2009, Scott Adams came up with a similar idea he called "broadcast shopping".