I n t e l  v.  H a m i d i

Berkman Home * Intel v. Hamidi       Facts       Legal      * Documents      * Cases      * Commentary       In the News

Legal Documents   Table of Cases   Commentary  Key Intel v. Hamidi Court Documents Pleadings:   Intel's Complaint (Oct. 6, 1998) Alleging trespass to chattels and nuisance and requesting actual damages, a preliminary injunction, and a permanent injunction.   Hamidi's Answer (Nov. 12, 1998) Asserting that the granting of an injunction in this case would constitute a prior restraint on freedom of speech in violation of both the federal and the California constitutions. Preliminary Injunction:   Hamidi's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Nov. 12, 1998) Hamidi's Declaration in Opposition to Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Nov.12, 1998) Preliminary Injunction Granted (Nov. 24, 1998) Summary Judgment:   Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dec. 9, 1998) Intel's Memorandum of Points and Authorities for Motion for Summary Judgment (Dec. 9, 1998) Hamidi's Application for Order to Continue Summary Judgment (Dec. 17, 1999) Hamidi's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Application for Order to Continue (Dec. 17, 1998) Hamidi's Declaration in Support of Application for Order to Continue (Dec. 17, 1998) Note:  Continuance granted. Hamidi's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Apr. 5, 1999) Arguing that there was insufficient evidence to demonstrate trespass to chattels and that an injunction would violate the First Amendment. Hamidi's Declaration in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment (Apr. 5, 1999) Hamidi's Response to Statement of Undisputed Facts (Apr. 5, 1999) Intel's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (Apr. 14, 1999) Arguing that Intel's email system was not a public forum and that the granting of an injunction would not constitute state action. Tentative Ruling Denying Intel's Motion for Summary Judgment (Apr. 16, 1999) Holding that the motion was insufficient because it did not address damages or the nuisance cause of action. Intel's Waiver of Claim for Money Damages (Apr. 17, 1999) Intel's Request for Dismissal of Nuisance Cause of Action (Apr. 17, 1999) Tentative Ruling Granting Motion for Summary Judgment (Apr. 28, 1999) Holding that the evidence presented was sufficient to demonstrate trespass to chattels, that Intel's email system was not a public forum and that Hamidi's emails were not a form of protected speech. Order for Entry of Final Judgment Granting Motion for Summary Judgment (June 16, 1999) The Appeal: Hamidi's Notice of Appeal Filed (July 2, 1999) EFF Amicus Curiae Brief Filed (Jan. 18, 2000) Hamidi's Appeal Brief Filed (Jan. 18, 2000)