Paradigms for Studying the Internet: Difference between revisions
(→Links) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<div class="editsection noprint editlink plainlinksneverexpand" align="right" style="float: right; margin: 5px; background:#eeeeff; color:#111111; border: 4px solid #dddddd; text-align: center;"> | |||
<big>'''Syllabus'''</big> | |||
{| border="0" cellspacing="4" cellpadding="4" style="background:#eeeeff; text-align: left;" | |||
| | |||
* [[Politics and Technology of Control: Introduction|Jan 25]] | |||
* [[Paradigms for Studying the Internet|Feb 1]] | |||
* [[New Economic Models|Feb 8]] | |||
* [[Peer Production and Collaboration|Feb 15]] | |||
* [[Collective Action and Decision-making|Feb 22]] | |||
* [[New and Old Media, Participation, and Information|Mar 1]] | |||
* [[Law's Role in Regulating Online Conduct and Speech|Mar 8]] | |||
* Mar 15 - ''No class'' | |||
| | |||
* [[Regulating Speech Online|Mar 22]] | |||
* [[Internet Infrastructure and Regulation|Mar 29]] | |||
* [[Copyright in Cyberspace|Apr 5]] | |||
* [[Control and Code: Privacy Online|Apr 12]] | |||
* [[Internet and Democracy|Apr 19]] | |||
* [[Internet and Democracy: The Sequel|Apr 26]] | |||
* [[Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare|May 3]] | |||
* [[Final Project|May 10]] - ''No class'' | |||
|} | |||
<br clear="right" /> | |||
</div> | |||
'''February 1''' | |||
Before we can even begin exploring the who's, what's, and why's -- we need to answer the critical question of '''how.''' Indeed, the phrase "studying the web" could embrace a staggering world of possible routes to explore, even before beginning to examine its relationship with society and culture. We need something to guide us through this massive field of (very interesting!) foxholes, and link the ideas we encounter into a consistent piece. We need some kind of structure to allow us to ''understand'' what we are looking at, the same way a chemist thinks of things in terms of atoms and molecules, or a philosopher can think about things in terms of schools of thought. | Before we can even begin exploring the who's, what's, and why's -- we need to answer the critical question of '''how.''' Indeed, the phrase "studying the web" could embrace a staggering world of possible routes to explore, even before beginning to examine its relationship with society and culture. We need something to guide us through this massive field of (very interesting!) foxholes, and link the ideas we encounter into a consistent piece. We need some kind of structure to allow us to ''understand'' what we are looking at, the same way a chemist thinks of things in terms of atoms and molecules, or a philosopher can think about things in terms of schools of thought. | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 24 January 2011
February 1
Before we can even begin exploring the who's, what's, and why's -- we need to answer the critical question of how. Indeed, the phrase "studying the web" could embrace a staggering world of possible routes to explore, even before beginning to examine its relationship with society and culture. We need something to guide us through this massive field of (very interesting!) foxholes, and link the ideas we encounter into a consistent piece. We need some kind of structure to allow us to understand what we are looking at, the same way a chemist thinks of things in terms of atoms and molecules, or a philosopher can think about things in terms of schools of thought.
This class will propose and develop one framework for the web, which will structure both the discussion and topic matter covered in the course, as well as the methodology that you should apply to your assignments.
Readings
Yochai Benkler, The Wealth of Networks Read pages 379-396 (the rest of this chapter expands the discussions of each layer in more detail, if you want to read more about them)
John Perry Barlow, A Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace
Chris Locke, Doc Searls & David Weinberger, Cluetrain Manifesto (just the manifesto)
Optional Readings
Jack Goldsmith & Tim Wu, Digital Borders
Jonathan Zittrain, The Future of the Internet - Chapters 1 & 2
Videos Watched in Class
Class Discussion
Although Wikipedia offers knowledge on extensive topics, holding the better model, is there not a huge concern that there is no longer postings of validated facts versus mere opinion?
Links
For people interested in a more technical primer on the architecture of the web, how email works, etc. check out ethan zuckerman and andrew mclaughlin's Introduction to Internet Architecture and Institutions
Some fred turner resources: video presentation, audio presentation, and homepage
Jason Scott on The Great Failure of Wikipedia