Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare: Difference between revisions

From Technologies of Politics and Control
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 39: Line 39:
* [http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/publications/papers/view/-/id/967/ On Cyber Warfare]
* [http://www.chathamhouse.org.uk/publications/papers/view/-/id/967/ On Cyber Warfare]
A little early for this, but I would like to share this nice paper written by analysts and researchers at Chatham House. It's pretty fundamental, I would recommend it to anyone who encounters this subject for the very first time. --[[User:Jastify|Jastify]] 22:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
A little early for this, but I would like to share this nice paper written by analysts and researchers at Chatham House. It's pretty fundamental, I would recommend it to anyone who encounters this subject for the very first time. --[[User:Jastify|Jastify]] 22:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
| Great recommendation.  I've added the executive summary to the required readings list. --[[User:Dardia|Dardia]] 23:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
: Great recommendation.  I've added the executive summary to the required readings list. --[[User:Dardia|Dardia]] 23:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)


== Links ==
== Links ==

Revision as of 18:51, 10 February 2011

May 3

Cybersecurity has been identified as one of the greatest threats facing the United States today, but it is ill-defined and almost impossible to address. How can we frame this problem to better inspire solutions? How should government, military, businesses, and technologists approach the problem from different angles and do these different approaches work together?

Readings

Optional Readings

Class Discussion

A little early for this, but I would like to share this nice paper written by analysts and researchers at Chatham House. It's pretty fundamental, I would recommend it to anyone who encounters this subject for the very first time. --Jastify 22:55, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

: Great recommendation.  I've added the executive summary to the required readings list. --Dardia 23:50, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Links