Law's Role in Regulating Online Conduct and Speech: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
== Optional Readings == | == Optional Readings == | ||
* [ | * [http://www.ejiltalk.org/in-the-dock-in-paris/ Prof. Joseph Weiler: In the Dock, in Paris] | ||
* [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1689865 David Ardia, Reputation in a Networked World: Revisiting the Social Foundations of Defamation Law] (Part IV) | * [http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1689865 David Ardia, Reputation in a Networked World: Revisiting the Social Foundations of Defamation Law] (Part IV) | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 7 February 2011
March 8
What is law's role in regulating online conduct and speech? At this point in the course you should be ready to tackle this question from a number of different perspectives. In this class we will begin to explore what role law is capable of playing as well as what role it should play. Remember John Perry Barlow's Declaration of Independence of Cyberspace which you read earlier in the course? Has his view of law's limited role been borne out? The sources of law impacting online conduct and speech are many, from intellectual property to tort to the First Amendment. Throughout today's class, we’ll tie the legal doctrines together with three themes:
- How regulation changes when it’s carried out by computers, rather than by people.
- Whether going online increases or decreases government control.
- The new kinds of power possessed by online intermediaries.
Assignments
Readings
- David Johnson & David Post, Law and Borders (excerpts)
Optional Readings
- Prof. Joseph Weiler: In the Dock, in Paris
- David Ardia, Reputation in a Networked World: Revisiting the Social Foundations of Defamation Law (Part IV)