Assigned Readings: Difference between revisions

From Technologies of Politics and Control
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:


=February 19 - [[Whose Values? International Issues with Internet Regulation]]=
=February 19 - [[Whose Values? International Issues with Internet Regulation]]=
{{:Whose_Values%3F_International_Issues_with_Internet_Regulation}}
{{:Whose_Values}}


=February 26 - [[Regulating Speech Online]]=
=February 26 - [[Regulating Speech Online]]=
Line 29: Line 29:
=March 27 - [[Internet and Democracy]]=
=March 27 - [[Internet and Democracy]]=
{{:Internet and Democracy}}
{{:Internet and Democracy}}


=March 8 - [[Law's Role in Regulating Online Conduct and Speech]]=
=March 8 - [[Law's Role in Regulating Online Conduct and Speech]]=

Revision as of 10:22, 24 January 2013

This page contains the readings for the entire class. Please keep in mind that readings will be updated over the course of the semester, so check back frequently to make sure you aren't missing anything!

January 29 - Politics and Technology of Control: Introduction

Readings/Watchings

Optional Readings


February 5 - Paradigms for Studying the Internet

Readings

Optional Readings


February 12 - A Series of Tubes: Infrastructure, Broadband, and Baseline Content Control

Readings

Optional Readings

  • Dawn Nunziato, Virtual Freedom (Chs. 1 & 7) (pending)


February 19 - Whose Values? International Issues with Internet Regulation

Readings

  • Case Study: The Innocence of Muslims

Optional Readings


February 26 - Regulating Speech Online

Readings

  • Case Study: The SPEECH Act

Optional Readings

Links

Links from Adobe Connect Session

US Constitution: http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution.html

State constitutions: http://www.constitution.org/cons/usstcons.htm

US regulations are in the Code of Federal Regulations: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/browse/collectionCfr.action?collectionCode=CFR

Map of the circuit courts and their jurisdictions: http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/images/CircuitMap.pdf

The Supreme Court has been taking fewer and fewer cases: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/29/us/29bar.html?_r=0

The International Shoe test: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Shoe_v._Washington

A very influential case addressing websites is a district court case from Pittsburgh called Zippo Manufacturing v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zippo_Manufacturing_Co._v._Zippo_Dot_Com,_Inc

A more recent case of "Libel Tourism" - this time concerning parties from Ethiopia: http://blog.indexoncensorship.org/2013/02/25/london-libel-ruling-against-ethiopian-dissident-shows-urgent-need-for-reform/

Shaari v. Harvard: http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/427/427mass129.html

This org has done a lot to make sure that online sites have to remove child porn: http://www.missingkids.com/home

The NPR talk show On Point with Tom Ashbrook had a segment on Cyberbullying and Sexual Shaming: http://onpoint.wbur.org/2013/01/28/cyberbullying


March 5 - Copyright Part 1: Guiding Principles and Online Application

Assignments

The second half of assignment 2 (commenting on prospectuses) is due before class today. Information on the assignment can be found here.

Readings/Watchings

Optional Readings


March 12 - Copyright Part 2: Enforcement and Balances

Readings/Watchings

Case Study: SOPA/PIPA

Case Study: ISP "Six Strikes"

Optional Readings


March 19 - No class (Spring Break)

March 26 - Collective Action and Decision-making

Readings

Optional Readings

  • Divided They Blog - a paper showing trackbacks between political blogs, mentioned by Ethan Zuckerman in his review of Cass Sunstein's Infotopia
  • On a similar topic: Cross-Ideological Discussions among Conservative and Liberal Bloggers, by Eszter Hargittai, et al.
    • Abstract: With the increasing spread of information technologies and their potential to filter content, some have argued that people will abandon the reading of dissenting political opinions in favor of material that is closely aligned with their own ideological position. We test this theory empirically by analyzing both quantitatively and qualitatively Web links among the writings of top conservative and liberal bloggers. Given our use of novel methods, we discuss in detail our sampling and data collection methodologies. We find that widely read political bloggers are much more likely to link to others who share their political views. However, we find no increase in this pattern over time. We also analyze the content of the links and find that while many of the links are based on straw-man arguments, bloggers across the political spectrum also address each others writing substantively, both in agreement and disagreement.



March 27 - Internet and Democracy

Readings

Additional Resources



March 8 - Law's Role in Regulating Online Conduct and Speech

Readings

Optional Readings


April 3 - Control and Code: Privacy Online

Readings

Optional Readings


April 10 - Internet and Democracy: The Sequel

Readings


Additional Resources

Apr 24 - The Wikileaks Case

{{:The Wikileaks Case]]

May 1 - Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare

Readings

Optional Readings


May 8 - Final Project due