Copyright in Cyberspace: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* [[Politics and Technology of Control: Introduction|Jan 24]] | * [[Politics and Technology of Control: Introduction|Jan 24]] | ||
* [[Paradigms for Studying the Internet|Jan 31]] | * [[Paradigms for Studying the Internet|Jan 31]] | ||
* [[New Economic Models|Feb | * [[Regulating Speech Online|Feb 7]] | ||
* [[Peer Production and Collaboration|Feb | * [[New Economic Models|Feb 14]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Peer Production and Collaboration |Feb 21]] | ||
* [[New and Old Media, Participation, and Information | * [[Copyright in Cyberspace |Feb 28]] | ||
* [[New and Old Media, Participation, and Information |Mar 6]] | |||
* Mar 13 - ''No class'' | * Mar 13 - ''No class'' | ||
| | | | ||
* [[ | * [[Collective Action and Decision-making |Mar 20]] | ||
* [[Internet | * [[Internet and Democracy |Mar 27]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Control and Code: Privacy Online |Apr 3]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Internet and Democracy: The Sequel |Apr 10]] | ||
* [[Internet and | * [[Internet Infrastructure and Regulation |Apr 17]] | ||
* [[ | * [[The Wikileaks Case |Apr 24]] | ||
* [[Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare|May 1]] | * [[Cybersecurity and Cyberwarfare|May 1]] | ||
* [[Final Project|May 8]] - ''No class'' | * [[Final Project|May 8]] - ''No class'' | ||
Revision as of 08:54, 12 January 2012
February 28
The Internet has enabled individuals to become involved in the production of media and to distribute their contributions widely at a very low cost. The former bastion of the entertainment industry is opening up to what many are calling a democratization of culture. The copyright doctrine of fair use seemingly bolsters the right to "recut, reframe, and recycle" previous works, but the protection fair use gives to those re-purposing copyrighted material is notoriously uncertain.
Digital and file-sharing technologies also spawned the proliferation of sharing of media and music, which has led to a number of controversial legal and technological strategies. The "notice-and-takedown" provisions of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ("DMCA") allow Internet service providers to limit their liability for the copyright infringements of their users if the ISPs expeditiously remove material in response to complaints from copyright owners. The DMCA provides for counter-notice and "put-back" of removed material, but some argue that the statutory mechanism can chill innovative, constitutionally-protected speech.
This class provides an overview of some major copyright law concepts and takes up some of the issues swirling around copyright in cyberspace.
Required Readings
- U.S. Copyright Office, Copyright Basics
- 17 U.S.C. § 107 ("Limitations on Exclusive Rights: Fair Use")
- 17 U.S.C. § 512(c) ("Information Residing on Systems or Networks at Direction of Users")
- Lawrence Lessig, Free Culture (pp. 1-20)
- Viacom v. YouTube: "Viacom Says YouTube Ignored Copyrights" (M. Helft, NY Times, 3/18/2010), What the Viacom vs. YouTube Verdict Means for Copyright Law
- Righthaven Copyright Lawsuits: Las Vegas Sun, Righthaven wins round in litigation campaign, Las Vegas Sun, Righthaven lawsuits backfire, reduce protections for newspapers, and skim this.
- The Rise of the News Aggregator: Legal Implications and Best Practices
Optional Readings
- Super Bust: Due Process and Domain Name Seizure
- Creative Commons: A Spectrum of Rights (comic)
- Center for Social Media, Recut, Reframe, Recyle (full report optional)
- MGM v. Grokster, 545 U.S. 913 (2005) (Sec. II, pp. 928 - 937)
- "Rowling Wins Lawsuit Against Potter Lexicon" (J. Eligon, NY Times, 9/8/08)
- New York Times Bits Blog: Mixing It Up Over Remixes and Fair Use
- EFF, Unsafe Harbors: Abusive DMCA Subpoenas and Takedown Demands
- The White House Blog: Concrete Steps Congress Can Take to Protect America's Intellectual Property