Pre-class Discussion for Jan 9: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=='''Lessig: Code 2.0'''== | =='''Lessig: Code 2.0'''== | ||
* In the last paragraph of the "Telephones" section on the bottom of page 64, Lessig states that failing to follow the laws of the US government is as bad an idea for General Motors as Ebay. Does this hold true for not-for-profit sites such as Wikipedia? Do not-for-profits pose less danger because they are not motivated by money or arguably more danger to Lessig's use of market controls simply because they won't be as beholden to the market? | * In the last paragraph of the "Telephones" section on the bottom of page 64, Lessig states that failing to follow the laws of the US government is as bad an idea for General Motors as Ebay. Does this hold true for not-for-profit sites such as Wikipedia? Do not-for-profits pose less danger because they are not motivated by money or arguably more danger to Lessig's use of market controls simply because they won't be as beholden to the market? [[User:Ttassin|Ttassin]] 22:27, 8 January 2008 (EST) | ||
=='''Zittrain: The Future of the Internet'''== | =='''Zittrain: The Future of the Internet'''== | ||
Revision as of 23:27, 8 January 2008
Lessig: Code 2.0
- In the last paragraph of the "Telephones" section on the bottom of page 64, Lessig states that failing to follow the laws of the US government is as bad an idea for General Motors as Ebay. Does this hold true for not-for-profit sites such as Wikipedia? Do not-for-profits pose less danger because they are not motivated by money or arguably more danger to Lessig's use of market controls simply because they won't be as beholden to the market? Ttassin 22:27, 8 January 2008 (EST)