Group 4 Dispute Results: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Vhettinger (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Vhettinger (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
**I've just skimmed part of the dispute, but it seems like a good, ongoing dispute that goes to heart of the Wikipedia ethos. I'm going to finish reading through and then comment. Also, as much as I like the Gavin Newsom question, I think it's not universally accessible. [[User:Ac|Ac]] 10:47, 7 January 2008 (EST) | **I've just skimmed part of the dispute, but it seems like a good, ongoing dispute that goes to heart of the Wikipedia ethos. I'm going to finish reading through and then comment. Also, as much as I like the Gavin Newsom question, I think it's not universally accessible. [[User:Ac|Ac]] 10:47, 7 January 2008 (EST) | ||
***Yeah, I tend to agree on that point; I simply saw the Newsom dispute and realized I could try and give a pretty decent answer to it, and figured I probably ought to. [[User:Kratville|Kratville]] 13:46, 7 January 2008 (EST) | ***Yeah, I tend to agree on that point; I simply saw the Newsom dispute and realized I could try and give a pretty decent answer to it, and figured I probably ought to. [[User:Kratville|Kratville]] 13:46, 7 January 2008 (EST) | ||
****I was suggesting IRL to Kelly and Alexis that perhaps we should come up with some internal concensus before we comment on the site, instead of just adding our two cents individually ( | ****I was suggesting IRL to Kelly and Alexis that perhaps we should come up with some internal concensus before we comment on the site, instead of just adding our two cents individually (12 cents collectively?).[[User:Vhettinger|Vhettinger]] 14:02, 7 January 2008 (EST) | ||
*Is Gavin Newsom still Catholic? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gavin_Newsom#No_longer_Roman_Catholic Gavin Newsom] | *Is Gavin Newsom still Catholic? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Gavin_Newsom#No_longer_Roman_Catholic Gavin Newsom] | ||
Revision as of 15:03, 7 January 2008
Dispute ideas:
- Is Santa Claus a mythical character? Santa Claus
- Is waterboarding torture? Waterboarding
- I've just skimmed part of the dispute, but it seems like a good, ongoing dispute that goes to heart of the Wikipedia ethos. I'm going to finish reading through and then comment. Also, as much as I like the Gavin Newsom question, I think it's not universally accessible. Ac 10:47, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Yeah, I tend to agree on that point; I simply saw the Newsom dispute and realized I could try and give a pretty decent answer to it, and figured I probably ought to. Kratville 13:46, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- I was suggesting IRL to Kelly and Alexis that perhaps we should come up with some internal concensus before we comment on the site, instead of just adding our two cents individually (12 cents collectively?).Vhettinger 14:02, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Yeah, I tend to agree on that point; I simply saw the Newsom dispute and realized I could try and give a pretty decent answer to it, and figured I probably ought to. Kratville 13:46, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- I've just skimmed part of the dispute, but it seems like a good, ongoing dispute that goes to heart of the Wikipedia ethos. I'm going to finish reading through and then comment. Also, as much as I like the Gavin Newsom question, I think it's not universally accessible. Ac 10:47, 7 January 2008 (EST)
- Is Gavin Newsom still Catholic? Gavin Newsom
- I just put a comment in on this, since I happen to have my electronic version of the Catholic Catechism on hand. Kratville 23:30, 6 January 2008 (EST)
- Should info from the Navy be included in article on Gulf War syndrome? Gulf War Syndrome
- Should Harry Potter film entry be based on original British book name? Harry Potter Khoffman 20:00, 6 January 2008 (EST)
- Should non-administrators be permitted to rollback on Wikipedia?-Lciaccio 11:47, 7 January 2008 (EST)
Group Comments
- I think we should go with the "is waterboarding torture?" dispute. -Lciaccio 11:37, 7 January 2008 (EST)