Online Monopolies: Virtue or Vice: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Full Video of the session can be found here: [http://bigthink.com/ideas/can-monopolies-save-the-internet Can Monopolies Save The Internet?] | Full Video of the session can be found here: [http://bigthink.com/ideas/can-monopolies-save-the-internet Can Monopolies Save The Internet?] | ||
back to [[syllabus]] | |||
== Introduction: Using Technology and Incentives to produce quality content == | == Introduction: Using Technology and Incentives to produce quality content == | ||
| Line 41: | Line 44: | ||
The specific content of our class centered around the concept of Online Monopolies | The specific content of our class centered around the concept of Online Monopolies | ||
Introduction | |||
== Old Outline == | == Old Outline == | ||
Prior to the class, students had access to this outline: [[Internet, Industry, and Investing|The Internet, Industry and Investing]]. The original framework for the course discussion was broader, but in planning the course we realized that narrowing the discussion would be beneficial | Prior to the class, students had access to this outline: [[Internet, Industry, and Investing|The Internet, Industry and Investing]]. The original framework for the course discussion was broader, but in planning the course we realized that narrowing the discussion would be beneficial | ||
Revision as of 15:25, 11 May 2009
Session Date: April 13, 2009
The Session was organized by ADK and DAL
It featured a debate on the Value of Online Monopolies between Professor Jonathan Zittrain and special guest Peter Thiel with closing remarks provided by Professor Terry Fisher
Full Video of the session can be found here: Can Monopolies Save The Internet?
back to syllabus
Introduction: Using Technology and Incentives to produce quality content
The Basic Framework of our course session can be replicated irrespective of the content.
The main ingredients are:
1) An interesting topic with two reasonable viewpoints
2) Two intelligent and articulate discussion leaders
3) An engaged classroom. 3 main ingredients:
a) No Laptops
b) Name placards.
c) Required preparation with threat of "cold-calling". (Note: in our session, we did not have to resort to "cold-calling" because the class was engaged and prepared).
i) To execute on cold-calling, we suggest a random-name generator, which can be designed in Microsoft Excel with the following formula:
=VLOOKUP(RANDBETWEEN(StudentNum1,StudentNumN),StudentNum1:StudentNamesN,2); <--- This function then refers to a two column list. Column 1 = List of "StudentNums" from 1 to N, where N = Number of students. Column 2 = List of student names.
A link to an example of this random name-caller can be found here Random Name Generator
4) Live video streaming. (We recommend using: [www.ustream.tv UStream])
5) Live Twittering. We had 4 students "tweet" throughout the class to engage the outside audience. This yielded participation and comments in the Q+A period.
6) Course Format: 10 Minutes Introduction; 30 Minutes Debate; 40 Minutes Question & Answer; 10 Minutes Closing
Topic Online Monopolies: Virtue or Vice
The specific content of our class centered around the concept of Online Monopolies
Introduction
Old Outline
Prior to the class, students had access to this outline: The Internet, Industry and Investing. The original framework for the course discussion was broader, but in planning the course we realized that narrowing the discussion would be beneficial