ICANN Yokohama DNSO Names Council Real-Time Comments

Messages marked with have been read to the assembled group.

Nestor Requeno (Member @ Large--Los Angeles, California USA)
PROPOSED FRAMOWORK FOR NEXT STEPS EXISTS (Developing Countries, 7/14/00 5:14:18 PM, #830)

I would respectfully direct the Names Council to review the public comments posted at the New gTLDs 74 Questions Public Forum for details on the administrative/staff implementation & roles towar the workgroup, sustatinability (structuaral and fiscal), and the integrated-constituency implemantation plan development.

Specifically please note the threads of July 4, 6, 9 and 11 -- re "15 Point Motion", "51 page response", "ICANN should administer TLDs one step further", and "Interesting twist".

Respectfully,

Nestor Requeno, Member @ Large
Los Angeles, California, USA

Teri ( )
Being Prepared (Review Committee, 7/14/00 2:58:50 PM, #829)

ICANN,

Why were these very "basic" accounting issues not already handled prior to this meeting.

The meeting is coming off as disorganized. This is a waste of time.

Why not focus on votes to add the gTLDs, etc. and quit with the unnecessary Intake Committees, etc.

Thanks

(2 messages total)

Other ICANN-Related Content from The Berkman Center for Internet & Society
Translate with Altavista Babelfish: Deutsch, Espanol, Francais, Italiano, Portugues

All times are Yokohama (GMT +9)

This file is automatically generated.