Difference between revisions of "Revising this guide"

From Harvard Open Access Project
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
Here some topics under discussion, on which good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
 
Here some topics under discussion, on which good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
  
* What are the best practices for responding to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
+
* How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
  
* What are the best practices for responding to authors who want to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?
+
* How should repositories respond to authors who ask to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?
  
 
== Procedure ==
 
== Procedure ==

Revision as of 16:27, 18 September 2012

Substance

Here some topics under discussion, on which good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.

  • How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
  • How should repositories respond to authors who ask to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?

Procedure

  • To suggest a revision, or be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact Stuart or Peter directly.