Revising this guide: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
* The guide is edited and written by [http://www.seas.harvard.edu/~shieber/ Stuart Shieber] and [http://bit.ly/suber-gplus Peter Suber], in consultation with a growing list of experts. For the latest list, see the [[Good practices for university open-access policies#Preface|Preface]]. | * The guide is edited and written by [http://www.seas.harvard.edu/~shieber/ Stuart Shieber] and [http://bit.ly/suber-gplus Peter Suber], in consultation with a growing list of experts. For the latest list, see the [[Good practices for university open-access policies#Preface|Preface]]. | ||
* To suggest a revision, or be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact [mailto:shieber@seas.harvard.edu Stuart] or [mailto:psuber@cyber.law.harvard.edu Peter] directly. | * To suggest a revision, or to be listed as an endorsing organization, please contact [mailto:shieber@seas.harvard.edu Stuart] or [mailto:psuber@cyber.law.harvard.edu Peter] directly. |
Revision as of 17:02, 18 September 2012
- This is a section within Good practices for university open-access policies.
Substance
Here are some topics under discussion, on which good practices are hard to identify or yet to emerge.
- How should universities respond to the Elsevier policy allowing green OA except at institutions with OA mandates?
- How should repositories respond to authors who ask to withdraw an article from the repository, for example, because it is mistaken, embarrassing, or superseded by a newer version?
Procedure
- The guide is edited and written by Stuart Shieber and Peter Suber, in consultation with a growing list of experts. For the latest list, see the Preface.