Talk:Module 3: The Scope of Copyright Law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Removing all content from page) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''CHRIS NOTES''' | |||
* Need a cite for the SCOTUS case mentioned under The Concept of Originality. | |||
* Need a cite for the US copyright statute quote. | |||
* The section on owning a copy vs owning a copyright should be substantiated and expanded | |||
* need a cite for Kluwer v. Lamoth in the joint authorship section | |||
* there is nothing about transformative use in the derivative/transformative section??? | |||
* isn't the "employment and works for hire" section redundant to the [edit] Audiovisual/Cinematographic Works And Computer Programs section at least in part? | |||
* | |||
Revision as of 22:40, 3 August 2009
CHRIS NOTES
- Need a cite for the SCOTUS case mentioned under The Concept of Originality.
- Need a cite for the US copyright statute quote.
- The section on owning a copy vs owning a copyright should be substantiated and expanded
- need a cite for Kluwer v. Lamoth in the joint authorship section
- there is nothing about transformative use in the derivative/transformative section???
- isn't the "employment and works for hire" section redundant to the [edit] Audiovisual/Cinematographic Works And Computer Programs section at least in part?