Talk:Module 3: The Scope of Copyright Law: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* isn't the "employment and works for hire" section redundant to the [edit] Audiovisual/Cinematographic Works And Computer Programs section at least in part? | * isn't the "employment and works for hire" section redundant to the [edit] Audiovisual/Cinematographic Works And Computer Programs section at least in part? | ||
* | * | ||
KAI Comments | |||
+ The inclusion of this sentence -- This rule provides a solution for performances that are being broadcast or transmitted, but, arguably, live performances that are simultaneously recorded but not transmitted are still unprotected by copyright law. -- may be more confusing than educational. | |||
Revision as of 23:19, 4 August 2009
CHRIS NOTES
- Need a cite for the SCOTUS case mentioned under The Concept of Originality.
- Need a cite for the US copyright statute quote.
- The section on owning a copy vs owning a copyright should be substantiated and expanded
- need a cite for Kluwer v. Lamoth in the joint authorship section
- there is nothing about transformative use in the derivative/transformative section???
- isn't the "employment and works for hire" section redundant to the [edit] Audiovisual/Cinematographic Works And Computer Programs section at least in part?
KAI Comments
+ The inclusion of this sentence -- This rule provides a solution for performances that are being broadcast or transmitted, but, arguably, live performances that are simultaneously recorded but not transmitted are still unprotected by copyright law. -- may be more confusing than educational.