Module 1: Copyright and the Public Domain: Difference between revisions

From EdX Copyright Online Course
Jump to navigation Jump to search
[unchecked revision][checked revision]
 
(52 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 10: Line 10:
==[[Image:casestudy.png|50px|]]Case study ==
==[[Image:casestudy.png|50px|]]Case study ==


'''“I want to build a course pack for my students, what material may I include?”'''
'''“I want to build a course pack for my students.  What material may I include?”'''


Angela, a music professor, is visiting her school’s library to collect material to build a course pack for her students. She would like to include excerpts from books, electronic resources and scores. She also wants to post selected music and video clips online with her commentary. Nadia, the librarian, will explain to Angela what she may and may not do under copyright law.
Angela, a music professor, is visiting her school’s library to collect material to build a course pack for her students. She would like to include excerpts from books, electronic resources and music scores. She also wants to post selected music and video clips online with her commentary. Nadia, the librarian, will explain to Angela what she may and may not do under copyright law.


</div>
</div>
Line 20: Line 20:
== What Is Copyright? ==
== What Is Copyright? ==


'''Copyright''' is a legal concept that grants authors and artists control over certain uses of their creations for defined periods of time. It limits who may copy, change, or share those creations.  
'''Copyright''' is a legal concept that grants authors and artists control over certain uses of their creations for defined periods of time. It limits who may copy, change, perform, or share those creations.  


There are several views on why copyright law should exist. One view is that copyright law encourages creativity by allowing creators to profit from their work. This goal of copyright is reflected in the wording of many copyright laws.  For example, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clause "Copyright Clause"] of the United States Constitution states that Congress may grant authors copyright protection for their works for a limited time in order to "promote the progress of science and useful arts." (US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.) Similarly, the stated purpose of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_anne Statute of Anne], the first copyright statute in England, was to "encourage learning."  Another view is that copyright law ensures that authors are paid fairly for their effort. A third view is that a creative work is part of the personality of its creator, and thus should be protected from being used without the creator's permission.  
As we saw in the Introduction, there are several views concerning the purposes of copyright law. One view is that copyright law encourages creativity by allowing creators to profit from their work. This goal of copyright is reflected in the wording of many copyright laws.  For example, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright_Clause "Copyright Clause"] of the United States Constitution states that Congress may grant authors copyright protection for their works for a limited time in order to "promote the progress of science and useful arts." (US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.) Similarly, the stated purpose of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_Anne Statute of Anne], the first copyright statute in England, was to "encourage learning." (8 Anne Chapter 19 (1710).) Another view is that copyright law ensures that authors are paid fairly for their effort. A third view is that a creative work is an expression of the personality of its creator, and thus should be protected from being used without the creator's permission.  


Although copyright law grants authors many rights in their works, it also limits these rights in many important ways. Some of these limitations help librarians add to the free flow of knowledge and culture. Chief among these limitations is the concept of the '''public domain.'''
Although copyright law grants authors many rights in their works, it also limits these rights in many important ways. Most of these limitations are quite specific, but a few are broad.  Several, as we will see, enable librarians to use or disseminate copyrighted materials more freely than they otherwise could.


== What Is The Public Domain? ==  
== What Is The Public Domain? ==  


The '''public domain''' is the name given to creative works that are not protected by copyright law -- either because they are no longer covered by the limited terms of copyright law, because their creators did not comply with various formal requirements in the past, or because their creators deliberately donated to the public the rights that they might have asserted. As an illustration, suppose the fictional country of Booktonia has a copyright term of 20 years. If a book was written in 1980, the copyright protection for the book in Booktonia would have ended 20 years later, in 2000.  Once the copyright in a work expires, the work is said to "fall into" the public domain. Once a work is in the public domain, the restrictions of copyright law no longer apply, and anyone may copy, reuse, or share the work as they wish.  
The '''public domain''' is the name given to the set of creative works that are not protected by copyright law -- either because they are no longer covered by the limited terms of copyright law, because their creators did not comply with various formal requirements in the past, or because their creators deliberately donated to the public the rights that they might have asserted. As an illustration, suppose the fictional country of Booktonia has a copyright term of 20 years. If a book was written in 1980, the copyright protection for the book in Booktonia would have ended 20 years later, in 2000.  Once the copyright in a work expires, the work is said to "fall into" the public domain. Once a work is in the public domain, the restrictions of copyright law no longer apply, and anyone may copy, reuse, or share the work as they wish.  


The public domain functions as a pool of creative material from which anyone may draw. It provides authors the raw materials from which the next generation of books, movies, songs, and knowledge can be built.  As the 14th century English poet Chaucer (whose work is now in the public domain) [http://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/English/Fowls.htm wrote], "For out of the old fields, as men say, Comes all this new corn, from year to year; And out of old books, in good faith, Comes all this new science that men learn."
The public domain functions as a pool of creative material from which anyone may draw. It provides authors the raw materials from which the next generation of books, movies, songs, and knowledge can be built.  As the 14th century English poet Chaucer (whose work is now in the public domain) [http://www.poetryintranslation.com/PITBR/English/Fowls.htm wrote], "For out of the old fields, as men say, Comes all this new corn, from year to year; And out of old books, in good faith, Comes all this new science that men learn."
Line 34: Line 34:
== Who Makes Copyright Law? ==
== Who Makes Copyright Law? ==


Several [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Module_2:_The_international_framework international treaties] set standards that all participating countries must follow when adopting or changing their copyright laws. However, within those limits, each nation sets its own laws. Those laws determine who can acquire a copyright, what rights the copyright holder enjoys, and how long the copyright lasts. As a result, copyright law varies significantly from one country to another.
Several [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Module_2:_The_International_Framework international treaties] set standards that all participating countries must follow when adopting or changing their copyright laws. However, within those limits, each nation sets its own laws. Those laws determine who can acquire a copyright, what rights the copyright holder enjoys, and how long the copyright lasts. As a result, copyright law varies significantly from one country to another.


Who makes copyright law in a country often depends on what legal system that country has.  In '''common law''' countries, courts are very powerful and have considerable control over what the law means. In '''civil law''' countries, courts tend to defer to the legislature. In other countries, '''religious legal systems''' also affect copyright rules. A discussion of the three main types of legal system, as well as lists of the legal systems of different countries may be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_systems_of_the_world here].  
In all countries, copyright law is shaped in part by legislatures, which adopt and often modify copyright statutes, and courts, which adjust and clarify the provisions of the statutes when applying them to particular cases.  In so-called '''common law''' countries, courts play somewhat more important roles than they do in so-called '''civil law''' countries, but the difference is not large. In some countries, '''religious legal systems''' also affect copyright rules. A discussion of the three main types of legal system, as well as lists of the legal systems of different countries may be found [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_systems_of_the_world here].  


No matter what the legal system, however, copyright law is constantly chanigng to meet new creative, technological, and social challenges. Often those changes are driven by interest groups who seek to benefit their members. Librarians' groups have often played important roles in the shaping of copyright law in the past -- and could play even more important roles in the future.
No matter what the legal system, however, copyright law is constantly chanigng to meet new creative, technological, and social challenges. Often those changes are driven by interest groups that seek to benefit their members. The library community has often played important roles in the shaping of copyright law in the past -- and could play even more important roles in the future.


== What Does Copyright Law Cover? ==
== What Does Copyright Law Cover? ==
Line 52: Line 52:
* computer software.
* computer software.


In some countries, sound recordings are also covered by copyright law; in other countries, sound recordings are protected by a separate, related set of rules known as “neighboring rights.”  In some countries, government works – such as maps, official reports, and judicial opinions – are protected by copyright law; in others, they are considered part of the public domain.
In some countries, sound recordings are also covered by copyright law. In other countries, sound recordings are protected by a separate, related set of rules known as “neighboring rights.”  In some countries, government works -- such as maps, official reports, and judicial opinions -- are protected by copyright law; in others, they are considered part of the public domain.


It is important to remember that '''copyright never applies to ideas or facts.'''  It only covers '''“original expression”''' – in other words, the distinctive way in which ideas are conveyed.  So, for example, the information contained in a science textbook is not protected by copyright law. You are free, after reading a textbook, to write and publish a new book conveying the same information in different words. Similarly, you are free, after reading a work of history, to write a novel incorporating the historical facts.
It is important to remember that '''copyright never applies to ideas or facts.'''  It only covers '''“original expression”''' -- in other words, the distinctive way in which ideas are conveyed.  So, for example, the information contained in a science textbook is not protected by copyright law. You are free, after reading a textbook, to write and publish a new book conveying the same information in different words. Similarly, you are free, after reading a work of history, to write a novel incorporating the historical facts.


Most countries require the original expression to be fixed in a '''tangible medium''', like paper or a digital recording format, in order to be protected by copyright law.  In those countries, improvisational performances – for example, of jazz or dance – are not protected unless their authors record them.
A few countries (most notably, the United States) require the original expression to be fixed in a '''tangible medium''', like paper or a digital recording format, in order to be protected by copyright law.  In those countries, improvisational performances -- for example, of jazz or dance -- are not protected unless their authors record them.


In general, the author of a work receives copyright protection as soon as the work has been fixed – for example, through writing, painting, or audio recording. Copyright does not protect a work until it is fixed. For this reason, a screenplay that exists only in the screenwriter’s mind or the plot of a novel that the novelist explains orally to a potential publisher are not protected.  But once '''fixation''' occurs – even of a rough, preliminary draft –  that version of the work becomes protected, even if it has not yet been published or even made public. So, for example, private letters, diaries, and email messages are all protected by copyright law.
Copyright law covers works that have not been published or even made public. So, for example, private letters, diaries, and email messages are all protected by copyright law.


Some countries used to require published works to be registered with a central office or to carry a copyright notice with the name of the author and the year of publication in order to be protected by copyright.  Such '''formalities''' are no longer necessary for a work to be covered by copyright.  However, registering a copyright may help prove authorship or identify who must be contacted before a work can be reused.  In some countries, registration of a work is necessary before the author is permitted to sue someone for copyright infringement.  In addition, some countries continue to require publishers to deposit one copy of every new work in a designated office, such as a national library.
Some countries used to require published works to be registered with a central office or to carry a copyright notice with the name of the author and the year of publication in order to be protected by copyright law.  Such '''formalities''' are no longer necessary for a work to be covered by copyright law.  However, registering a copyright may help prove authorship or identify who must be contacted for permission before a work can be reused.  In some countries, registration of a work is necessary before the author is permitted to sue someone for copyright infringement. (Foreign authors, however, are exempted from this requirement.) In addition, some countries continue to require publishers to deposit one copy of every new work in a designated office, such as a national library.


== Who Gets A Copyright? ==
== Who Gets A Copyright? ==
Line 66: Line 66:
A copyright is ordinarily obtained by the creator of a work.  If you write a novel, paint a painting, or compose a song, you will generally acquire the copyright in your creation.
A copyright is ordinarily obtained by the creator of a work.  If you write a novel, paint a painting, or compose a song, you will generally acquire the copyright in your creation.


The situation is more complicated if you are an employee creating the work as part of your employment. Countries vary a great deal in how they deal with such situations. Typically, in countries that follow the common law tradition, the copyright in a work prepared by an employee goes to the employer. By contrast, in countries that follow the civil law tradition, the copyright typically goes to the employee. However, in civil-law countries, employment contracts or even copyright law often give employers rights over their employees’ creations similar (though not identical) to the copyrights enjoyed by employers in common-law countries.  Finally, in the United States and some other countries, when certain limited types of works are created by an independent contractor, the copyright will be granted to the one who commissioned the work.
The situation is more complicated if you are an employee creating the work as part of your employment. Countries vary a great deal in how they deal with such situations. Typically, in countries that follow the common law tradition, the copyright in a work prepared by an employee within the scope of employment goes to the employer. By contrast, in countries that follow the civil law tradition, the copyright typically goes to the employee. However, in civil-law countries, employment contracts or even copyright law often give employers rights over their employees’ creations similar (though not identical) to the copyrights enjoyed by employers in common-law countries.  Finally, in the United States and some other countries, when specific types of works are created in specific circumstances by independent contractors, the contractors and the organizations commissioning the works may agree in writing that the commissioning organizations shall be awarded the copyrights.


== What Rights Come With Copyright? ==
== What Rights Come With Copyright? ==
Line 74: Line 74:
'''Economic rights''' are intended to give authors the opportunity to use their works to make money. These are things that typically only the owner of the copyright may do unless the owner grants permission to others. (Important exceptions to the requirement to obtain the copyright holder's permission, such as fair use and compulsory licenses, are discussed below.)  The primary economic rights are:
'''Economic rights''' are intended to give authors the opportunity to use their works to make money. These are things that typically only the owner of the copyright may do unless the owner grants permission to others. (Important exceptions to the requirement to obtain the copyright holder's permission, such as fair use and compulsory licenses, are discussed below.)  The primary economic rights are:


* the right to reproduce the work – in other words, to make copies of it;
* the right to reproduce the work -- in other words, to make copies of it;
* the right to create derivative works - such as translations, abridgments, or adaptations;
* the right to create derivative works -- such as translations, abridgments, or adaptations;
* the right to distribute the work – for example, by selling or renting copies of it;
* the right to distribute the work -- for example, by selling or renting copies of it;
* the right to perform or display the work publicly.
* the right to perform or display the work publicly.


'''Moral rights''' are designed to protect authors’ noneconomic interests in their creations. Moral rights do not exist in all countries.  Generally speaking, they are recognized more widely and are enforced more firmly in civil-law countries than in common-law countries.  The primary moral rights are:
'''Moral rights''' are designed to protect authors’ noneconomic interests in their creations. Moral rights do not exist in all countries.  Generally speaking, they are recognized more widely and are enforced more firmly in civil-law countries than in common-law countries.  The primary moral rights are:


* the right of integrity – for example, the right to prevent the destruction or defacement of a painting or sculpture;
* the right of integrity -- for example, the right to prevent the destruction or defacement of a painting or sculpture;
* the right of attribution – in other words, the right to be given appropriate credit for one’s creations, and not to be blamed for things one did not create;
* the right of attribution -- in other words, the right to be given appropriate credit for one’s creations, and not to be blamed for things one did not create;
* the right of disclosure – the right to determine when and if a work shall be made public;
* the right of disclosure -- the right to determine when and if a work shall be made public;
* the right of withdrawal – the right to remove from public circulation copies of a work one has come to regret.
* the right of withdrawal -- the right (in certain limited circumstances) to remove from public circulation copies of a work one has come to regret.


'''Neighboring rights''', sometimes called related rights, are close cousins of copyright. They are economic rights granted to persons who are not authors of a work but who contribute to its creation. They may include performers, producers, and broadcasting associations.  
'''Neighboring rights''', sometimes called related rights, are close cousins of copyright. The oldest and best known neighboring rights are economic rights granted to persons who are not authors of a work but who contribute to its creation -- such as performers, producers, and broadcasting associations.  


Some countries also have privacy and publicity rights that complement copyright. For example, some countries prevent the public distribution of works that contain personally identifiable information, unless permission is granted by that person.
Some countries also have privacy and publicity rights that complement copyright. For example, some countries prevent the public distribution of works that contain personally identifiable information, unless permission is granted by that person.
Line 92: Line 92:
== The Limits of Copyright ==
== The Limits of Copyright ==


The rights described above are subject to important limitations.  First, as mentioned above, many older books, articles, recordings, and other works are part of the '''public domain.''' These materials may be used by anyone for any purpose. Unfortunately, it is not always easy to figure out when a particular work has fallen into the public domain. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_situations_by_country This directory] contains some helpful information on how long the term of copyright lasts in different countries around the world. It also has useful tips on when a work enters the public domain. Sometimes, authors or artists will dedicate their work to the public domain, much like a landholder will sometimes donate property to a town so it may become a park. In these instances, the work becomes free to use immediately.  
The rights described above are subject to important limitations.  First, as mentioned above, many older books, articles, recordings, and other works are part of the '''public domain.''' These materials may be used by anyone for any purpose. Unfortunately, it is not always easy to figure out when a particular work has fallen into the public domain. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyright_situations_by_country This directory((.link_red))] contains some helpful information on how long the term of copyright lasts in different countries around the world. It also has useful tips on when a work enters the public domain. Sometimes, a copyright holder will dedicate a work to the public domain before the copyright expires, much like a landholder will sometimes donate property to a town so it may become a park. In these instances, the work becomes free to use immediately.  


In addition, the copyright laws of every country include '''exceptions and limitations''' to copyright. These identify specific activities that users can do without fear of violating copyright. Examples include quoting short passages of literary works for the purposes of criticism; photocopying for archival purposes by libraries; and converting works into formats accessible by handicapped persons. Other exceptions are broader and less well defined, such as the '''fair-use doctrine''' of the United States and a few other countries.  
In addition, the copyright laws of every country include '''exceptions and limitations''' to copyright. These identify activities that users can do without fear of violating copyright. While these exceptions vary by country, some common examples include copying for personal use, quoting short passages of literary works for the purposes of criticism, photocopying for archival purposes by libraries, and converting works into formats accessible by handicapped persons. Other exceptions are broader and less well defined, such as the '''fair use doctrine''' of the United States and the '''fair dealing''' doctrines employed in some African countries.  


Finally, most countries have '''compulsory licensing''' systems for certain types of works. Under a compulsory licensing system, copyright holders are required to permit certain uses of their works as long as the user pays a fee set by a government agency. Such regimes are becoming increasingly common.  
Finally, most countries have '''compulsory licensing''' systems for certain types of works. Under a compulsory licensing system, copyright holders are required to permit certain uses of their works as long as the user pays a fee set by a government agency or courts. Such regimes are becoming increasingly common.


== Copyright Licenses ==
== Copyright Licenses ==
Line 102: Line 102:
If none of these exceptions or limitations apply, it may still be possible to make use of a copyrighted work.  In order to do so, the user must obtain a '''license''' from the copyright holder that gives the user permission to use the content in a particular way. The copyright holder may demand a fee for such use, or may allow the use for free. The license should be specific and in writing in order to avoid confusion.  
If none of these exceptions or limitations apply, it may still be possible to make use of a copyrighted work.  In order to do so, the user must obtain a '''license''' from the copyright holder that gives the user permission to use the content in a particular way. The copyright holder may demand a fee for such use, or may allow the use for free. The license should be specific and in writing in order to avoid confusion.  


It is not always necessary to contact the copyright holder directly to obtain a license to use their works.  Many countries have '''collecting societies''' that act as agents for large numbers of copyright holders, for instance by negotiating "blanket licenses" with radio or television stations that want to use their members' works. One collecting society that many librarians are familiar with is the Copyright Clearance Center, which provides blanket annual licenses for the use of its members' content.  
It is not always necessary to contact the copyright holder directly to obtain a license to use their works.  Many countries have '''collecting societies''' (also known as collective administration organizations) that act as agents for large numbers of copyright holders.  Such organizations now administer licenses pertaining to a wide variety of uses of copyrighted materials.  Examples include broadcasts of musical composition and the use of various modern technologies to reproduce graphic works or literary works.
 
Another set of organizations assist and encourage those copyright holders who are willing to give away some of their rights for free. The most famous of these are [http://creativecommons.org/ Creative Commons] and the [http://www.fsf.org/ Free Software Foundation], but others are emerging.


In addition, the '''Creative Commons''' standard also allows authors or artists to create general licenses in advance and thus facilitate reuse of their works by third parties. For example, an author might license his book under a Creative Commons BY-NC license. "BY" means that the work should be attributed to the author; "NC" means the work can only be used for noncommercial purposes. Should these two conditions be met, the work can be reused freely.




Line 115: Line 116:
* Are any of the materials in the public domain?  
* Are any of the materials in the public domain?  
* Are any of the remaining materials licensed under a Creative Commons license or a similar set of terms that allow their use?  
* Are any of the remaining materials licensed under a Creative Commons license or a similar set of terms that allow their use?  
* Are any of the remaining materials freed for use by a statutory exception, such as fair use?  
* Are any of the remaining materials freed for use by any of the statutory exceptions contained in their nation's copyright statute?  
* Does the library already own a license to use the materials in the way Angela proposes?  
* Does the library already own a license to use the materials in the way Angela proposes?  


Line 123: Line 124:
==[[image:resource.png|50px|]] Additional resources ==
==[[image:resource.png|50px|]] Additional resources ==


“A Fair(y) Use Tale” is a 2008 short movie on copyright and fair use in the US.
A comprehensive discussion of the aspects of copyright law that affect librarians -- and, in particular, librarians in developing countries -- may be found in the [http://www.eifl.net/cps/sections/services/eifl-ip/issues/handbook/handbook-e eIFL Handbook on Copyright and Related Issues for Libraries((.link_green))].
According to the synopsis, “professor Eric Faden of Bucknell University created this humorous, yet informative, review of copyright principles delivered through the words of the very folks we can thank for nearly endless copyright terms”.
http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/documentary-film-program/film/a-fair-y-use-tale


A comprehensive discussion of the aspects of copyright law that affect librarians -- and, in particular, librarians in developing countries -- may be found in the  [http://www.eifl.net/cps/sections/services/eifl-ip/issues/handbook/handbook-e eIFL Handbook on Copyright and Related Issues for Libraries]
Carol C. Henderson, “[http://www.ala.org/ala/issuesadvocacy/copyright/copyrightarticle/librariescreatures.cfm Libraries as Creatures of Copyright: Why Librarians Care about Intellectual Property Law and Policy((.link_green))],” 1998.
The former Executive Director of the Washington Office American Library Association discusses the roles played by librarians in maintaining copyright balance.


Carol C. Henderson, “Libraries as Creatures of Copyright: Why Librarians Care about Intellectual Property Law and Policy,” 1998.
[http://www.economist.com/debate/overview/144 A short debate between Professors William Fisher and Justin Hughes((.link_red))], organized in May 2009 by the Economist magazine, examines the merits and demerits of the copyright system.  
The former Executive Director of the Washington Office American Library Association explains which role librarians may play to maintain copyright balance.
http://www.acrl.org/ala/aboutala/offices/wo/woissues/copyrightb/copyrightarticle/librariescreatures.cfm


A debate between Professors William Fisher and Justin Hughes, organized in May 2009 by the Economist magazine, concerning the merits and demerits of the copyright system may be found on the [http://www.economist.com/debate/overview/144 Economist's website].
The [http://www.21coe-win-cls.org/rclip/e_index.html Research Center for the Legal System of Intellectual Property (RCLIP)], in cooperation with the [http://www.law.washington.edu/casrip Center for Advanced Study & Research on Intellectual Property (CASRIP)] of the University of Washington School of Law, is building [http://www.21coe-win-cls.org/rclip/db/search_form.php a comprehensive database of court decisions] involving intellectual property (including copyright law) in every country throughout the world.  The database is not yet complete but already constitutes a highly valuable research tool, particularly for Asian countries.
 
A map, prepared by William Fisher, describing the main features of copyright law in the United States and, to a limited extent, other countries, is available [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/people/tfisher/IP/IP%20Maps.htm here((.link_green))].
 
“[http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/documentary-film-program/film/a-fair-y-use-tale A Fair(y) Use Tale]” is a 2008 short movie on copyright and fair use in the US.
According to the synopsis, “professor Eric Faden of Bucknell University created this humorous, yet informative, review of copyright principles delivered through the words of the very folks we can thank for nearly endless copyright terms.”


The documentaries, [http://www.stealthisfilm.com/Part1/ Steal This Film Part I] (2006) and [http://www.stealthisfilm.com/Part2/ Steal This Film Part II] (2007), produced by The League of Noble Peers, offer entertaining and highly critical views of the recent trend toward strengthening the rights of copyright owners, particularly with respect to the unauthorized sharing of music and movies.
The documentaries, [http://www.stealthisfilm.com/Part1/ Steal This Film Part I] (2006) and [http://www.stealthisfilm.com/Part2/ Steal This Film Part II] (2007), produced by The League of Noble Peers, offer entertaining and highly critical views of the recent trend toward strengthening the rights of copyright owners, particularly with respect to the unauthorized sharing of music and movies.


The [http://www.21coe-win-cls.org/rclip/e_index.html Research Center for the Legal System of Intellectual Property (RCLIP)], in cooperation with the [Center for Advanced Study & Research on
A [http://www.librarycopyright.net/digitalslider/ helpful guide to determining which works have fallen into the public domain in the United States] has been provided by Michael Brewer and the American Library Association Office for Information Technology Policy.   
Intellectual Property Center for Advanced Study & Research on Intellectual Property (CASRIP)] of the University of Washington School of Law, is building [http://www.21coe-win-cls.org/rclip/db/search_form.php a comprehensive database of court decisions] involving intellectual property (including copyright law) in every country throughout the world.  The database is not yet complete, but already constitutes a highly valuable research tool, particularly for Asian countries.


A helpful guide to determining which works have fallen into the public domain in the United States has been provided by Michael Brewer and the American Library Association Office for Information Technology Policy: http://www.librarycopyright.net/digitalslider/
[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZblrRs3fkSU A Librarian's 2.0 Manifesto] offers a provocative conception of the responsibilities of librarians, particularly in an environment characterized by rapid technological change.
 
==Cases==
 
The following judicial opinion explores and applies some of the principles discussed in this module:
 
[http://www.ipsofactoj.com/international/2001/Part10/int2001%2810%29-013.htm Telegraph Group, Ltd. v. Ashdown, Part 10 Case 13 (Court of Appeal, England & Wales, 2001)((.link_red))] (the relationships among freedom of expression, the public interest, and intellectual property rights)


[http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZblrRs3fkSU A Librarian's 2.0 Manifesto] offers a provocative conception of the responsibilities of librarians, particularly in an environment characterized by rapid technological change.


== [[image:question.png|50px|]] Assignment and discussion questions ==
== [[image:question.png|50px|]] Assignment and discussion questions ==
Line 150: Line 157:
Answer one of the following questions:
Answer one of the following questions:


1. Explain briefly what copyright law attempts to protect as well as what freedoms are reserved for or available to the public.
1. Explain briefly what copyright law attempts to protect, as well as what freedoms are reserved for or available to the public.


2. Which (if any) of the justifications for copyright law make sense to you?  
2. Which (if any) of the justifications for copyright law make sense to you?  
3. Are the restrictions that copyright law places on librarians too strict or too loose?




'''[[image:discussion.png|50px]]Discussion Question(s)'''
'''[[image:discussion.png|50px]]Discussion Question(s)'''


Select one of the answers that your colleagues provided to the Assignment questions, and comment on it.  Explain why you agree or disagree.  Do not hesitate to give examples you have faced as an author, as a member of the public, or as a librarian.
Select one of the answers that your colleagues provided to the Assignment questions and comment on it.  Explain why you agree or disagree.  Do not hesitate to give examples you have faced as an author, as a member of the public, or as a librarian.


== Contributors ==  
== Contributors ==  


This module was  created by [[Contributors#rosnay|Melanie Dulong de Rosnay]]. It was then edited by a team including [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#diaz Sebastian Diaz], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#fisher William Fisher], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#gasser Urs Gasser], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#holland Adam Holland], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#isbell Kimberley Isbell], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#maclay Colin Maclay], [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#moshirnia Andrew Moshirnia], and [http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/copyrightforlibrarians/Contributors#peterson Chris Peterson].
This module was  created by [[Contributors#rosnay|Melanie Dulong de Rosnay]]. It was then edited by a team including [[Contributors#diaz|Sebastian Diaz]], [[Contributors#fisher|William Fisher]], [[Contributors#gasser|Urs Gasser]], [[Contributors#holland|Adam Holland]], [[Contributors#isbell|Kimberley Isbell]], [[Contributors#jaszi|Peter Jaszi]], [[Contributors#maclay|Colin Maclay]], [[Contributors#moshirnia|Andrew Moshirnia]], and [[Contributors#peterson|Chris Peterson]].




{{NavFooter}}
{{NavFooter}}

Latest revision as of 17:28, 9 January 2012

Blocks.png

Key.png Learning objective

This module explores the basic concepts of copyright law. It provides a general introduction to the elements of copyright important to librarians. Other modules will discuss these topics in detail.

Casestudy.pngCase study

“I want to build a course pack for my students. What material may I include?”

Angela, a music professor, is visiting her school’s library to collect material to build a course pack for her students. She would like to include excerpts from books, electronic resources and music scores. She also wants to post selected music and video clips online with her commentary. Nadia, the librarian, will explain to Angela what she may and may not do under copyright law.

Lesson.png Lesson

What Is Copyright?

Copyright is a legal concept that grants authors and artists control over certain uses of their creations for defined periods of time. It limits who may copy, change, perform, or share those creations.

As we saw in the Introduction, there are several views concerning the purposes of copyright law. One view is that copyright law encourages creativity by allowing creators to profit from their work. This goal of copyright is reflected in the wording of many copyright laws. For example, the "Copyright Clause" of the United States Constitution states that Congress may grant authors copyright protection for their works for a limited time in order to "promote the progress of science and useful arts." (US Constitution, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8.) Similarly, the stated purpose of the Statute of Anne, the first copyright statute in England, was to "encourage learning." (8 Anne Chapter 19 (1710).) Another view is that copyright law ensures that authors are paid fairly for their effort. A third view is that a creative work is an expression of the personality of its creator, and thus should be protected from being used without the creator's permission.

Although copyright law grants authors many rights in their works, it also limits these rights in many important ways. Most of these limitations are quite specific, but a few are broad. Several, as we will see, enable librarians to use or disseminate copyrighted materials more freely than they otherwise could.

What Is The Public Domain?

The public domain is the name given to the set of creative works that are not protected by copyright law -- either because they are no longer covered by the limited terms of copyright law, because their creators did not comply with various formal requirements in the past, or because their creators deliberately donated to the public the rights that they might have asserted. As an illustration, suppose the fictional country of Booktonia has a copyright term of 20 years. If a book was written in 1980, the copyright protection for the book in Booktonia would have ended 20 years later, in 2000. Once the copyright in a work expires, the work is said to "fall into" the public domain. Once a work is in the public domain, the restrictions of copyright law no longer apply, and anyone may copy, reuse, or share the work as they wish.

The public domain functions as a pool of creative material from which anyone may draw. It provides authors the raw materials from which the next generation of books, movies, songs, and knowledge can be built. As the 14th century English poet Chaucer (whose work is now in the public domain) wrote, "For out of the old fields, as men say, Comes all this new corn, from year to year; And out of old books, in good faith, Comes all this new science that men learn."

Who Makes Copyright Law?

Several international treaties set standards that all participating countries must follow when adopting or changing their copyright laws. However, within those limits, each nation sets its own laws. Those laws determine who can acquire a copyright, what rights the copyright holder enjoys, and how long the copyright lasts. As a result, copyright law varies significantly from one country to another.

In all countries, copyright law is shaped in part by legislatures, which adopt and often modify copyright statutes, and courts, which adjust and clarify the provisions of the statutes when applying them to particular cases. In so-called common law countries, courts play somewhat more important roles than they do in so-called civil law countries, but the difference is not large. In some countries, religious legal systems also affect copyright rules. A discussion of the three main types of legal system, as well as lists of the legal systems of different countries may be found here.

No matter what the legal system, however, copyright law is constantly chanigng to meet new creative, technological, and social challenges. Often those changes are driven by interest groups that seek to benefit their members. The library community has often played important roles in the shaping of copyright law in the past -- and could play even more important roles in the future.

What Does Copyright Law Cover?

Copyright law generally covers all “original works of authorship.” Such original works come in many forms. For example, in almost all countries, all of the following are protected by copyright law:

  • literary works (books, articles, letters, etc.);
  • musical works;
  • dramatic works (operas, plays);
  • graphic arts (photographs, sculptures, paintings, etc.);
  • motion pictures and audiovisual works (movies, videos, television programs, etc.);
  • architectural works; and
  • computer software.

In some countries, sound recordings are also covered by copyright law. In other countries, sound recordings are protected by a separate, related set of rules known as “neighboring rights.” In some countries, government works -- such as maps, official reports, and judicial opinions -- are protected by copyright law; in others, they are considered part of the public domain.

It is important to remember that copyright never applies to ideas or facts. It only covers “original expression” -- in other words, the distinctive way in which ideas are conveyed. So, for example, the information contained in a science textbook is not protected by copyright law. You are free, after reading a textbook, to write and publish a new book conveying the same information in different words. Similarly, you are free, after reading a work of history, to write a novel incorporating the historical facts.

A few countries (most notably, the United States) require the original expression to be fixed in a tangible medium, like paper or a digital recording format, in order to be protected by copyright law. In those countries, improvisational performances -- for example, of jazz or dance -- are not protected unless their authors record them.

Copyright law covers works that have not been published or even made public. So, for example, private letters, diaries, and email messages are all protected by copyright law.

Some countries used to require published works to be registered with a central office or to carry a copyright notice with the name of the author and the year of publication in order to be protected by copyright law. Such formalities are no longer necessary for a work to be covered by copyright law. However, registering a copyright may help prove authorship or identify who must be contacted for permission before a work can be reused. In some countries, registration of a work is necessary before the author is permitted to sue someone for copyright infringement. (Foreign authors, however, are exempted from this requirement.) In addition, some countries continue to require publishers to deposit one copy of every new work in a designated office, such as a national library.

Who Gets A Copyright?

A copyright is ordinarily obtained by the creator of a work. If you write a novel, paint a painting, or compose a song, you will generally acquire the copyright in your creation.

The situation is more complicated if you are an employee creating the work as part of your employment. Countries vary a great deal in how they deal with such situations. Typically, in countries that follow the common law tradition, the copyright in a work prepared by an employee within the scope of employment goes to the employer. By contrast, in countries that follow the civil law tradition, the copyright typically goes to the employee. However, in civil-law countries, employment contracts or even copyright law often give employers rights over their employees’ creations similar (though not identical) to the copyrights enjoyed by employers in common-law countries. Finally, in the United States and some other countries, when specific types of works are created in specific circumstances by independent contractors, the contractors and the organizations commissioning the works may agree in writing that the commissioning organizations shall be awarded the copyrights.

What Rights Come With Copyright?

The rights created by copyright law fall into two categories: economic rights and moral rights.

Economic rights are intended to give authors the opportunity to use their works to make money. These are things that typically only the owner of the copyright may do unless the owner grants permission to others. (Important exceptions to the requirement to obtain the copyright holder's permission, such as fair use and compulsory licenses, are discussed below.) The primary economic rights are:

  • the right to reproduce the work -- in other words, to make copies of it;
  • the right to create derivative works -- such as translations, abridgments, or adaptations;
  • the right to distribute the work -- for example, by selling or renting copies of it;
  • the right to perform or display the work publicly.

Moral rights are designed to protect authors’ noneconomic interests in their creations. Moral rights do not exist in all countries. Generally speaking, they are recognized more widely and are enforced more firmly in civil-law countries than in common-law countries. The primary moral rights are:

  • the right of integrity -- for example, the right to prevent the destruction or defacement of a painting or sculpture;
  • the right of attribution -- in other words, the right to be given appropriate credit for one’s creations, and not to be blamed for things one did not create;
  • the right of disclosure -- the right to determine when and if a work shall be made public;
  • the right of withdrawal -- the right (in certain limited circumstances) to remove from public circulation copies of a work one has come to regret.

Neighboring rights, sometimes called related rights, are close cousins of copyright. The oldest and best known neighboring rights are economic rights granted to persons who are not authors of a work but who contribute to its creation -- such as performers, producers, and broadcasting associations.

Some countries also have privacy and publicity rights that complement copyright. For example, some countries prevent the public distribution of works that contain personally identifiable information, unless permission is granted by that person.

The Limits of Copyright

The rights described above are subject to important limitations. First, as mentioned above, many older books, articles, recordings, and other works are part of the public domain. These materials may be used by anyone for any purpose. Unfortunately, it is not always easy to figure out when a particular work has fallen into the public domain. This directory((.link_red)) contains some helpful information on how long the term of copyright lasts in different countries around the world. It also has useful tips on when a work enters the public domain. Sometimes, a copyright holder will dedicate a work to the public domain before the copyright expires, much like a landholder will sometimes donate property to a town so it may become a park. In these instances, the work becomes free to use immediately.

In addition, the copyright laws of every country include exceptions and limitations to copyright. These identify activities that users can do without fear of violating copyright. While these exceptions vary by country, some common examples include copying for personal use, quoting short passages of literary works for the purposes of criticism, photocopying for archival purposes by libraries, and converting works into formats accessible by handicapped persons. Other exceptions are broader and less well defined, such as the fair use doctrine of the United States and the fair dealing doctrines employed in some African countries.

Finally, most countries have compulsory licensing systems for certain types of works. Under a compulsory licensing system, copyright holders are required to permit certain uses of their works as long as the user pays a fee set by a government agency or courts. Such regimes are becoming increasingly common.

Copyright Licenses

If none of these exceptions or limitations apply, it may still be possible to make use of a copyrighted work. In order to do so, the user must obtain a license from the copyright holder that gives the user permission to use the content in a particular way. The copyright holder may demand a fee for such use, or may allow the use for free. The license should be specific and in writing in order to avoid confusion.

It is not always necessary to contact the copyright holder directly to obtain a license to use their works. Many countries have collecting societies (also known as collective administration organizations) that act as agents for large numbers of copyright holders. Such organizations now administer licenses pertaining to a wide variety of uses of copyrighted materials. Examples include broadcasts of musical composition and the use of various modern technologies to reproduce graphic works or literary works.

Another set of organizations assist and encourage those copyright holders who are willing to give away some of their rights for free. The most famous of these are Creative Commons and the Free Software Foundation, but others are emerging.


Casestudy.png Back to the case study

Nadia (the librarian) should help Angela (the professor) organize the set of materials she has gathered by asking a series of questions:

  • Are any of the materials in the public domain?
  • Are any of the remaining materials licensed under a Creative Commons license or a similar set of terms that allow their use?
  • Are any of the remaining materials freed for use by any of the statutory exceptions contained in their nation's copyright statute?
  • Does the library already own a license to use the materials in the way Angela proposes?

If the materials are in the public domain, are licensed freely under a Creative Commons license, are covered by a statutory exemption, or are included in existing licenses, they may be used. If not, Angela will need to obtain permission from the copyright holder or a collective rights organization.

Resource.png Additional resources

A comprehensive discussion of the aspects of copyright law that affect librarians -- and, in particular, librarians in developing countries -- may be found in the eIFL Handbook on Copyright and Related Issues for Libraries((.link_green)).

Carol C. Henderson, “Libraries as Creatures of Copyright: Why Librarians Care about Intellectual Property Law and Policy((.link_green)),” 1998. The former Executive Director of the Washington Office American Library Association discusses the roles played by librarians in maintaining copyright balance.

A short debate between Professors William Fisher and Justin Hughes((.link_red)), organized in May 2009 by the Economist magazine, examines the merits and demerits of the copyright system.

The Research Center for the Legal System of Intellectual Property (RCLIP), in cooperation with the Center for Advanced Study & Research on Intellectual Property (CASRIP) of the University of Washington School of Law, is building a comprehensive database of court decisions involving intellectual property (including copyright law) in every country throughout the world. The database is not yet complete but already constitutes a highly valuable research tool, particularly for Asian countries.

A map, prepared by William Fisher, describing the main features of copyright law in the United States and, to a limited extent, other countries, is available here((.link_green)).

“A Fair(y) Use Tale” is a 2008 short movie on copyright and fair use in the US. According to the synopsis, “professor Eric Faden of Bucknell University created this humorous, yet informative, review of copyright principles delivered through the words of the very folks we can thank for nearly endless copyright terms.”

The documentaries, Steal This Film Part I (2006) and Steal This Film Part II (2007), produced by The League of Noble Peers, offer entertaining and highly critical views of the recent trend toward strengthening the rights of copyright owners, particularly with respect to the unauthorized sharing of music and movies.

A helpful guide to determining which works have fallen into the public domain in the United States has been provided by Michael Brewer and the American Library Association Office for Information Technology Policy.

A Librarian's 2.0 Manifesto offers a provocative conception of the responsibilities of librarians, particularly in an environment characterized by rapid technological change.

Cases

The following judicial opinion explores and applies some of the principles discussed in this module:

Telegraph Group, Ltd. v. Ashdown, Part 10 Case 13 (Court of Appeal, England & Wales, 2001)((.link_red)) (the relationships among freedom of expression, the public interest, and intellectual property rights)


Question.png Assignment and discussion questions

Assignment.pngAssignment

Answer one of the following questions:

1. Explain briefly what copyright law attempts to protect, as well as what freedoms are reserved for or available to the public.

2. Which (if any) of the justifications for copyright law make sense to you?


Discussion.pngDiscussion Question(s)

Select one of the answers that your colleagues provided to the Assignment questions and comment on it. Explain why you agree or disagree. Do not hesitate to give examples you have faced as an author, as a member of the public, or as a librarian.

Contributors

This module was created by Melanie Dulong de Rosnay. It was then edited by a team including Sebastian Diaz, William Fisher, Urs Gasser, Adam Holland, Kimberley Isbell, Peter Jaszi, Colin Maclay, Andrew Moshirnia, and Chris Peterson.


Home

Introduction

Course Materials:

The Rotisserie


Retrieved from "http://cyber.harvard.edu/cx/?title=Module_1:_Copyright_and_the_Public_Domain&oldid=3764"