IP Profile of Universities working in EM: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
* Identify what universities are the "Microsofts" of the field and what companies are the "IBMs" of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)  
* Identify what universities are the "Microsofts" of the field and what companies are the "IBMs" of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)  


== Universities ==
== Universities and Projects ==
'''[http://www.cmu.edu/ Carnegie Mellon University]'''
'''[http://www.cmu.edu/ Carnegie Mellon University]'''
*Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
*Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
*Host institution for OER project: [http://oli.web.cmu.edu/ Open Learning Initiative]
*Host institution for OER project: [http://oli.web.cmu.edu/ Open Learning Initiative]
*:"A collection of "cognitively informed", openly available and free online courses and course materials that enact instruction for an entire course. The project adds to online education the crucial elements of instructional design grounded in cognitive theory, formative evaluation for students and faculty, and iterative course improvement based on empirical evidence. A primary objective is to build a community of use that will play an important role in ongoing course development. The courses are developed in a modular fashion to allow faculty at a variety of institutions to deliver the courses as designed, or to modify the content and sequence to fit their needs." [http://oerwiki.iiep-unesco.org/index.php?title=OER_useful_resources/Development_and_publishing_initiatives#Institutional_initiatives (OER Wiki)]
*:"A collection of "cognitively informed", openly available and free online courses and course materials that enact instruction for an entire course. The project adds to online education the crucial elements of instructional design grounded in cognitive theory, formative evaluation for students and faculty, and iterative course improvement based on empirical evidence. A primary objective is to build a community of use that will play an important role in ongoing course development. The courses are developed in a modular fashion to allow faculty at a variety of institutions to deliver the courses as designed, or to modify the content and sequence to fit their needs." [http://oerwiki.iiep-unesco.org/index.php?title=OER_useful_resources/Development_and_publishing_initiatives#Institutional_initiatives (OER Wiki)]
'''[http://globaltext.terry.uga.edu/ Global Text Project]'''
*Joint project of the [http://www.terry.uga.edu/ Terry College of Business of the University of Georgia] and [http://www.daniels.du.edu/ The Daniels College of Business of the University of Denver]
*:"The Global Text Project, with plans to create a free library of 1,000 electronic texts for students in developing world. The library will cover the range of topics typically encountered in a university’s undergraduate programs. The global academic community and global corporations will be engaged in creating and sponsoring this library." [http://globaltext.terry.uga.edu/news_faqs?q=node/14 (FAQs)]
*Licenses: Uses Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License


'''[http://harvardbusiness.org/ Harvard Business School Press (HBSP)]'''
'''[http://harvardbusiness.org/ Harvard Business School Press (HBSP)]'''

Revision as of 13:02, 3 July 2009

Research Questions

  • What are the 5 top Universities in this field?
  • Correlate them with their main outputs (Data, Narratives, Tools)
  • Understand and identify cases where these universities are "experimenting" or "adopting" commons based approach. Are they adopting OA policies, for instance? Are they adopting Social Responsible License approaches?
  • Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)
  • Identify what universities are the "Microsofts" of the field and what companies are the "IBMs" of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)

Universities and Projects

Carnegie Mellon University

  • Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
  • Host institution for OER project: Open Learning Initiative
    "A collection of "cognitively informed", openly available and free online courses and course materials that enact instruction for an entire course. The project adds to online education the crucial elements of instructional design grounded in cognitive theory, formative evaluation for students and faculty, and iterative course improvement based on empirical evidence. A primary objective is to build a community of use that will play an important role in ongoing course development. The courses are developed in a modular fashion to allow faculty at a variety of institutions to deliver the courses as designed, or to modify the content and sequence to fit their needs." (OER Wiki)

Global Text Project

Harvard Business School Press (HBSP)

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

  • Location: Cambridge, MA, USA
  • Host institution of OER project: MIT OpenCourseWare Initiative (see #OpenCourseWare Consortium)
  • Academic Press: http://mitpress.mit.edu/
    MIT Press employs a traditional publishing model focusing on science and engineering texts. It publishes approximately 200 new books a year and 40 academic journals and sells "a higher proportion of our products outside the United States than any other U.S. university press".

Rice University

Oxford University Press

  • Location: New York, NY, USA
  • Higher Education Revenue 2008 (estimated): $550,260,000 (Mickey and Meaney 2008, 173)
  • About: "OUP USA publishes at a variety of levels for a wide range of audiences in almost every academic discipline. OUP USA produces approximately 500 titles each year, of which 250 are scholarly research monographs, and imports close to 800 such works from the U.K. and branch offices. OUP USA has 3,300 scholarly books in print and stocks imports from other OUP offices around the world." (Mickey and Meaney 2008, 174)
  • Strategy: "Like other higher education publishers, OUP USA is looking to technology and custom publishing as new avenues for its business. Oxford’s custom publishing program allows instructors to choose scholarly content to meet their needs and those of their students. Instructors choose chapters or content from a single textbook or several volumes organized as they wish. If they choose to supplement an Oxford text with their own materials, OUP USA prints and shrink wraps the material. (Mickey and Meaney 2008, 174)

Wisc-Online Resource Center

  • Location: Wisconsin, USA
  • About: "Wisc-Online is a consortium of the 16 two-year Wisconsin Technical Colleges formed to support the development and distribution of learning objects authored and technically developed by faculty and multimedia Flash designers." (FAQ)
  • Copyright: All learning objects remain copyrighted and source-code must be purchased.

Yale University

  • Location: New Haven, CT, USA
  • Host institution for OER project: Open Yale Courses
    "Open Yale Courses provides free and open access to a selection of introductory courses taught by distinguished teachers and scholars at Yale University." Courses are provided under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license.

OpenCourseWare Consortium

List of all OCWC Member Universities in the US

"An OpenCourseWare is a free and open digital publication of high quality educational materials, organized as courses. The OpenCourseWare Consortium is a collaboration of more than 200 higher education institutions and associated organizations from around the world creating a broad and deep body of open educational content using a shared model. The mission of the OpenCourseWare Consortium is to advance education and empower people worldwide through opencourseware." ('About Us')

University Press Directors on Free Access

copied from https://mx2.arl.org/Lists/SPARC-OAForum/Message/4978.html:

Position Statement From University Press Directors on Free Access to Scholarly Journal Articles:

1. The undersigned university press directors support the dissemination of scholarly research as broadly as possible.

2. We support the free access to scientific, technical, and medical journal articles no later than 12 months after publication. We
understand that the length of time before free release of journal articles will by necessity vary for other disciplines.

3. We support the principle that scholarly research fully funded by governmental entities is a public good and should be treated as
such. We support legislation that strengthens this principle and oppose legislation designed to weaken it.

4. We support the archiving and free release of the final, published version of scholarly journal articles to ensure accuracy and
citation reliability.

5. We will work directly with academic libraries, governmental entities, scholarly societies, and faculty to determine appropriate
strategies concerning dissemination options, including institutional repositories and national scholarly archives.

Meredith Babb
Director
University Press of Florida
Gainesville, FL

Thomas Bacher
Director
University of Akron Press
Akron, OH

Michael Burton
Director
University Press of New England

Walter Hildebrandt
Director
Athabasca University Press
Edmonton, Alberta

Jane Hoehner
Director
Wayne State University Press
Detroit, MI

Donna Livingstone
Director
University of Calgary Press
Calgary, Alberta

Phil Pochoda
Director
The University of Michigan Press
Ann Arbor, MI

Mike Rossner
Executive Director
The Rockefeller University Press
New York, NY

Sandy Thatcher
Director
Penn State University
University Park, PA

Bruce Wilcox
Director
University of Massachusetts Press
Amherst, MA

Navigation

Bibliography for Item 8 in EM
Back to The Higher Education Level
Back to Educational Materials
Back to Report April 2009#Educational Materials