IP Profile of Universities working in EM-K12: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Research Questions= | ==Research Questions== | ||
*What are the 5 top Universities in this field? | *What are the 5 top Universities in this field? | ||
**Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools) | **Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
**Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants) | **Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants) | ||
**Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field | **Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field | ||
=Navigation= | ==Navigation== | ||
Back to [[The K-12 Level]]<br> | Back to [[The K-12 Level]]<br> | ||
Back to [[Educational Materials]] | Back to [[Educational Materials]] | ||
[[Category:Educational Materials]] | |||
Revision as of 11:50, 29 April 2009
Research Questions
- What are the 5 top Universities in this field?
- Correlate them with their main outputs (Data. Narratives. Tools)
- Understand and identify cases where these universities are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons based approach. Are they adopting OA/OER policies, for instance? Are they open licensing their materials?
- Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)
- Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field
Back to The K-12 Level
Back to Educational Materials