IP Profile of Universities working in EM: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 35: Line 35:
[[Bibliography for Item 8 in EM]]<br>
[[Bibliography for Item 8 in EM]]<br>
Back to [[Educational Materials]]<br>
Back to [[Educational Materials]]<br>
Back to [[Report April 2009]]
Back to [[Report April 2009#Educational Materials]]


[[Category:Educational Materials]]
[[Category:Educational Materials]]

Revision as of 10:08, 17 April 2009

What are the 5 top Universities in this field?

  • Correlate them with their main outputs (Data, Narratives, Tools)
  • Understand and identify cases where these universities are “experimenting” or “adopting” commons based approach. Are they adopting OA policies, for instance? Are they adopting Social Responsible License approaches?
  • Identify these cases and treat them as entities that will also be placed in our mapping device (the quadrants)
  • Identify what universities are the “Microsofts” of the field and what companies are the “IBMs” of the field (Use the questionnaire to guide your research when appropriate - Carol will select specific relevant questions)

Universities

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology
    • University Website: http://www.mit.edu/
    • OER Project: MIT OpenCourseWare Initiative
    • Academic Press: http://mitpress.mit.edu/
      • Traditional publishing model
      • Focus on science and engineering texts
      • Publishing Statistics
        • Approx. 200 new books a year
        • 40 academic journals
        • "sell a higher proportion of our products outside the United States than any other U.S. university press"
  2. Rice University
  3. Harvard Business School Press (HBSP)

Navigation

Bibliography for Item 8 in EM
Back to Educational Materials
Back to Report April 2009#Educational Materials