IP in EM-K12: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: =Research Questions= #Define the main legal tools of protection (privatization) available for the field (patents, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, contracts, public domain) (remember ...) |
No edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Research Questions= | ==Research Questions== | ||
Define the main legal tools of protection (privatization) available for the field (patents, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, contracts, public domain) (remember the exercise done in genomics and proteomics). | |||
:(note to R.A. - try to create a matrix that cross references the previous two questions - let's try several ways to visualize how the narratives either hit barriers based on protection or can be synergistic via open licensing approaches - an example is the table in the Case Analysis Framework) | |||
== Navigation = | |||
== Introduction == | |||
:''see [[IP in EM#Introduction]]'' | |||
= Navigation = | |||
[[Bibliography for Item 4 in EM]]<br> | |||
Back to [[The K-12 Level]]<br> | Back to [[The K-12 Level]]<br> | ||
Back to [[Educational Materials]] | Back to [[Educational Materials]] | ||
[[Category:Educational Materials]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:12, 19 June 2009
Research Questions
Define the main legal tools of protection (privatization) available for the field (patents, copyright, trademark, trade secrets, contracts, public domain) (remember the exercise done in genomics and proteomics).
- (note to R.A. - try to create a matrix that cross references the previous two questions - let's try several ways to visualize how the narratives either hit barriers based on protection or can be synergistic via open licensing approaches - an example is the table in the Case Analysis Framework)
Introduction
Bibliography for Item 4 in EM
Back to The K-12 Level
Back to Educational Materials