Educational Materials/Bibliography by Research Question: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:


== Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in EM ==
== Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in EM ==
=== General Sources ===
 
=== K-12 Sources ===
* Cola, C. et al., 2009. Crossing the K-12 digital divide: Understanding and playing in a complex market. ''TS Insights'', 5(1). Available at: http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/51A2B147879DA97B852574400011BAAF [Accessed May 5, 2009].  
* Cola, C. et al., 2009. Crossing the K-12 digital divide: Understanding and playing in a complex market. ''TS Insights'', 5(1). Available at: http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/51A2B147879DA97B852574400011BAAF [Accessed May 5, 2009].  
* Iiyoshi, T. & Kumar, M.S.V., 2008. ''Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge'', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
* Iiyoshi, T. & Kumar, M.S.V., 2008. ''Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge'', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.


=== K-12 Sources ===
=== Higher Education Sources ===
 
=== Higher-Education Sources ===
*Bakos, Y., Brynjolfsson, E. & Lichtman, D., 1999. Shared Information Goods, University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 67. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=130904 [Accessed April 3, 2009].
*Bakos, Y., Brynjolfsson, E. & Lichtman, D., 1999. Shared Information Goods, University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 67. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=130904 [Accessed April 3, 2009].
*Besen, S.M. & Kirby, S.N., 1987. ''Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties''. Santa Monica, Calif: The RAND Corporation. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED297745 [Accessed April 4, 2009].
*Besen, S.M. & Kirby, S.N., 1987. ''Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties''. Santa Monica, Calif: The RAND Corporation. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED297745 [Accessed April 4, 2009].
*Besen, S.M., 1986. Private copying, reproduction costs, and the supply of intellectual property. ''Information Economics and Policy'', 2(1), 5-22.
*Besen, S.M., 1986. Private copying, reproduction costs, and the supply of intellectual property. ''Information Economics and Policy'', 2(1), 5-22.
* Cola, C. et al., 2009. Crossing the K-12 digital divide: Understanding and playing in a complex market. ''TS Insights'', 5(1). Available at: http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/51A2B147879DA97B852574400011BAAF [Accessed May 5, 2009].
*Dyl, E.A., 1983. A note on price discrimination by academic journals. ''Library Quarterly'', 53, 161-168.
*Dyl, E.A., 1983. A note on price discrimination by academic journals. ''Library Quarterly'', 53, 161-168.
* Iiyoshi, T. & Kumar, M.S.V., 2008. ''Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge'', Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
*Liebowitz, S.J., 1985. Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals. ''Journal of Political Economy'', 93(5), 945-57.
*Liebowitz, S.J., 1985. Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals. ''Journal of Political Economy'', 93(5), 945-57.
*Spilhaus, Jr., A.F., 1982. Page charges. In Ad Hoc Committee on Economics of Publication, ed. ''Economics of Scientific Journals''. Bethesda, MD: Council of Biology Editors.
*Spilhaus, Jr., A.F., 1982. Page charges. In Ad Hoc Committee on Economics of Publication, ed. ''Economics of Scientific Journals''. Bethesda, MD: Council of Biology Editors.

Revision as of 16:56, 17 April 2010

Bibliographic entries used in each research question (based on the Field Research Methodology).

Overview of Economics of Intellectual Property in EM

K-12 Sources

  • Cola, C. et al., 2009. Crossing the K-12 digital divide: Understanding and playing in a complex market. TS Insights, 5(1). Available at: http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/51A2B147879DA97B852574400011BAAF [Accessed May 5, 2009].
  • Iiyoshi, T. & Kumar, M.S.V., 2008. Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Higher Education Sources

  • Bakos, Y., Brynjolfsson, E. & Lichtman, D., 1999. Shared Information Goods, University of Chicago Law School, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 67. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=130904 [Accessed April 3, 2009].
  • Besen, S.M. & Kirby, S.N., 1987. Private Copying, Appropriability, and Optimal Copying Royalties. Santa Monica, Calif: The RAND Corporation. Available at: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=ED297745 [Accessed April 4, 2009].
  • Besen, S.M., 1986. Private copying, reproduction costs, and the supply of intellectual property. Information Economics and Policy, 2(1), 5-22.
  • Cola, C. et al., 2009. Crossing the K-12 digital divide: Understanding and playing in a complex market. TS Insights, 5(1). Available at: http://www.pwc.com/extweb/pwcpublications.nsf/docid/51A2B147879DA97B852574400011BAAF [Accessed May 5, 2009].
  • Dyl, E.A., 1983. A note on price discrimination by academic journals. Library Quarterly, 53, 161-168.
  • Iiyoshi, T. & Kumar, M.S.V., 2008. Opening Up Education: The Collective Advancement of Education through Open Technology, Open Content, and Open Knowledge, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Liebowitz, S.J., 1985. Copying and Indirect Appropriability: Photocopying of Journals. Journal of Political Economy, 93(5), 945-57.
  • Spilhaus, Jr., A.F., 1982. Page charges. In Ad Hoc Committee on Economics of Publication, ed. Economics of Scientific Journals. Bethesda, MD: Council of Biology Editors.

Overall Picture of the EM field

General Sources

  • ACSFA, 2007. Proposed and Passed State Legislation Pertaining to Textbook Affordability (2004-2007), Washington, DC: Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. Available at: http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/acsfa/edlite-txtbkstudy.html [Accessed March 12, 2009].
  • Book Industry Study Group, 2005. Book Industry Trends, New York: Book Industry Study Group.
  • Book Industry Study Group, 2008. Book Industry Trends, New York: Book Industry Study Group.
  • Burrus, C.S., 2007. Connexions: An Open Educational Resource for the 21st Century. Educational Technology Magazine: The Magazine for Managers of Change in Education, 47(6), 19-22.
  • Greco, A.N., 1997. The Book Publishing Industry, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Greco, A.N., Rodriguez, C.E. & Wharton, R.M., 2007. The Culture and Commerce of Publishing in the 21st Century, Stanford, Calif: Stanford Business Books.
  • Lardinois, F., 2009 (July 31). 'Google's Vision for the Future of Google Books: EBook Store, Google Editions'. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/external/readwriteweb/2009/07/31/31readwriteweb-googles-vision-for-the-future-of-google-boo-50804.html [Accessed August 5, 2009].
  • McIlroy, T., 2008 (August 7). 'The Future of Educational Publishing'. 'The Future of Publishing. Available at: http://www.thefutureofpublishing.com/industries/the_future_of_educational_publishing.html [Accessed May 6, 2009].
  • U.S. Census Bureau, Company Statistics Division & Bowan, L., 2008. Number of Firms, Number of Establishments, Employment, and Annual Payroll by Employment Size of the Enterprise for the United States, All Industries 2006, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://www2.census.gov/csd/susb/2006/usalli06.xls [Accessed March 19, 2009].

K-12 Sources

Higher Education Sources

Outputs and Products of the field: Data, narratives and tools produced by the EM field

Legal tools available for and in use by the actors of EM field: IP in EM

Competitive advantages in EM

IP Profile of Biggest for-profit companies in EM

IP Profile of non-profit companies in EM

IP Profile of Universities working in EM

IP Profile of Associations in EM

Commons-based Cases in EM

Alternative Business Models in EM