Peter Levy Interview Notes - September 18, 2009: Difference between revisions

From Commons Based Research
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
**Strategic Partnerships, [http://curriki.org Curriki]
**Strategic Partnerships, [http://curriki.org Curriki]
**Email: plevy [at] curriki [dot] org
**Email: plevy [at] curriki [dot] org
== Questions ==
* Sustainability -> Toward traditional publishing model
* Follow up to discussion of Future of OER
* How can our research and connections help facilitation greater partnering between OER projects and/or with traditional publishers?


== Notes ==
== Notes ==
* PETER on OER: “It's got to exist and its got to be easy to use or nobody will use it”
* ASIDE: Peter's slide deck is for content partners
=== Intro to Curriki ===
* Spun out 3.5 years ago from Sun Microsystems (largely funded personally by Scott McNealy)
* All code is LPGL, all content is CC-BY
* First/Largest OER project in K-12
* Tests show that standards-based curriculum push students to score better on standardized tests--does not apply to supplementary materials.
* There is not going to be any
* Legislation in Indiana for public textbook dollars to be used for electronic resources
* Texas is now allowing e-Textbooks to go through adoption process
* Gov. Perry signed new law to liberalize how textbook dollars are spent
* THE Journal, Geoff Fletcher has been covering this
* CAN INTERVIEW HIM via Peter Levy
=== Curriki Statistics ===
* 85,000 registered members
* 31,000+ assets (ranges in size from whole course to individual worksheet)
* PBS Newshour, Sesame Workshop, and more
* Assets will double in next year if trends continue
* HuffPost blog on OpenTech by Curriki to start Monday
=== Content shared by... ===
* For-profit pubishers
* Non-profit publishers/organizations
* School districts/regional organizations
* Ministries of education
* Schools of education
* The global community of educators
=== Community Activity/Editing ===
* About 10% of community is very involved
* Within 24 hours of posting, a human checks uploaded content for being appropriate
* Then a subject content expert reviews material (search by topics for things that have already been reviewed)
=== Future Developments ===
* To deal with interoperability: plug into LMS
*: LMS would manage different formats and different content licenses
* Curriki is putting together a module for teachers to learn how to use and participate in OER (professional development ?)
=== Philosophy ===
* Curriki is about creating high organized database of content and displaying it (not set up to provide an interactive interface) -- VidiTalk allows for video use -- but its about displaying database content
* The point is not building these kind of sites, but going into schools and getting teachers to use this (OER) content/contribute.
=== Sustainability ===
* “Honestly, I think that sustainability is still a giant question mark”
* Outside of very big donors like Hewlett or Scott McNealy, Curriki is not sustainable
===Here is the ‘learn list’===
* If you don’t like the this then try this alternative
** Asst. Superintendents for Instruction, Dept. Heads
*** Job will change to curating from all different sources to provide teachers a custom selection of content that adheres to standards and fits a variety of instructional forms (interactive process)
*** Traditional publishers will have to radically change to service provision creating the interfaces and custom databases of content for each educational context (school)
OPINION: Adoption of these kind of models and OER needs to be top-down in order to truly pervade industry
===Some community member gave Curriki===
* If you are approved on one standard then you get listed as “approved”
* Find out actual adoption of CK-12 books (no one is adopting these books, no one is even talking about them)
** Continue Education Credit through Foothill College for learning instructional design in under to evaluate existing Curriki content and improve them
** INCENTIVIZE GETTING INVOLVED WITH OER THROUGH PUBLIC FUNDING (LIBERALIZATION)
Professional leadership in education program at Harvard


Discourse about how curriculum mandates standards are a barrier to adoption of open models / not Flickr,
* Test-based versus learning-based


= Navigation =
= Navigation =

Revision as of 16:26, 22 October 2009

Conducted with Erhardt Graeff and Carolina Rossini in person at the Berkman Center on September 18, 2009, discussing Curriki's approach to OER.

Interviewee

  • Peter Levy
    • Strategic Partnerships, Curriki
    • Email: plevy [at] curriki [dot] org

Questions

  • Sustainability -> Toward traditional publishing model
  • Follow up to discussion of Future of OER
  • How can our research and connections help facilitation greater partnering between OER projects and/or with traditional publishers?

Notes

  • PETER on OER: “It's got to exist and its got to be easy to use or nobody will use it”
  • ASIDE: Peter's slide deck is for content partners

Intro to Curriki

  • Spun out 3.5 years ago from Sun Microsystems (largely funded personally by Scott McNealy)
  • All code is LPGL, all content is CC-BY
  • First/Largest OER project in K-12
  • Tests show that standards-based curriculum push students to score better on standardized tests--does not apply to supplementary materials.
  • There is not going to be any
  • Legislation in Indiana for public textbook dollars to be used for electronic resources
  • Texas is now allowing e-Textbooks to go through adoption process
  • Gov. Perry signed new law to liberalize how textbook dollars are spent
  • THE Journal, Geoff Fletcher has been covering this
  • CAN INTERVIEW HIM via Peter Levy

Curriki Statistics

  • 85,000 registered members
  • 31,000+ assets (ranges in size from whole course to individual worksheet)
  • PBS Newshour, Sesame Workshop, and more
  • Assets will double in next year if trends continue
  • HuffPost blog on OpenTech by Curriki to start Monday

Content shared by...

  • For-profit pubishers
  • Non-profit publishers/organizations
  • School districts/regional organizations
  • Ministries of education
  • Schools of education
  • The global community of educators

Community Activity/Editing

  • About 10% of community is very involved
  • Within 24 hours of posting, a human checks uploaded content for being appropriate
  • Then a subject content expert reviews material (search by topics for things that have already been reviewed)

Future Developments

  • To deal with interoperability: plug into LMS
    LMS would manage different formats and different content licenses
  • Curriki is putting together a module for teachers to learn how to use and participate in OER (professional development ?)

Philosophy

  • Curriki is about creating high organized database of content and displaying it (not set up to provide an interactive interface) -- VidiTalk allows for video use -- but its about displaying database content
  • The point is not building these kind of sites, but going into schools and getting teachers to use this (OER) content/contribute.

Sustainability

  • “Honestly, I think that sustainability is still a giant question mark”
  • Outside of very big donors like Hewlett or Scott McNealy, Curriki is not sustainable

Here is the ‘learn list’

  • If you don’t like the this then try this alternative
    • Asst. Superintendents for Instruction, Dept. Heads
      • Job will change to curating from all different sources to provide teachers a custom selection of content that adheres to standards and fits a variety of instructional forms (interactive process)
      • Traditional publishers will have to radically change to service provision creating the interfaces and custom databases of content for each educational context (school)

OPINION: Adoption of these kind of models and OER needs to be top-down in order to truly pervade industry

Some community member gave Curriki

  • If you are approved on one standard then you get listed as “approved”
  • Find out actual adoption of CK-12 books (no one is adopting these books, no one is even talking about them)
    • Continue Education Credit through Foothill College for learning instructional design in under to evaluate existing Curriki content and improve them
    • INCENTIVIZE GETTING INVOLVED WITH OER THROUGH PUBLIC FUNDING (LIBERALIZATION)

Professional leadership in education program at Harvard

Discourse about how curriculum mandates standards are a barrier to adoption of open models / not Flickr,

  • Test-based versus learning-based

Navigation

Back to Contacts for EM
Back to Educational Materials