How do we define the public interest: Difference between revisions

From Berkman@10
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
* FCC Chairman Martin, who should know a thing or two about the public interest
* FCC Chairman Martin, who should know a thing or two about the public interest
* William Galston, School of Public Policy, of University of Maryland
* William Galston, School of Public Policy, of University of Maryland
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Galston
** http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Galston
    http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3671/is_200710/ai_n21137282/pg_8
** http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3671/is_200710/ai_n21137282/pg_8
* Andrew McLaughlin (Or Alan Davidson or Rick Whitt), from Google Policy
* Andrew McLaughlin (Or Alan Davidson or Rick Whitt), from Google Policy
* Marvin Ammori, General Counsel of Free Press
* Marvin Ammori, General Counsel of Free Press
* Pat Aufderheide, author of "Communications Policy and the Public Interest"
* Pat Aufderheide, author of "Communications Policy and the Public Interest"

Revision as of 20:24, 2 March 2008

Thanks for including me. I'd be interested in this, and my proposal is a bit of low-hanging fruit (at least for me). It builds on this line from the Berkman@10 report: "We were chartered to identify, study, and engage the most difficult and fundamental problems of the digital age, and to share in their resolution in ways that advance the public interest" as well as the "How do we define 'the public interest'?" question on page 41.

My proposal is a panel simply titled "How do we define the public interest?" Potential panelists include: