Open Media: Difference between revisions

From Berkman@10
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
''“It’s a few nanoseconds into the the Big Bang, we have 4 light elements and no galaxies”''  
''“It’s a few nanoseconds into the Big Bang, we have four light elements and no galaxies”''  
– Doc Searls on the state of new media
– Doc Searls on the state of new media


Persephone's assertions (for discussion!)
'''Persephone's 7 assertions (for discussion!)'''


1. (Old media is broken) In the United States, new content creation and dissemination possibilities afforded by new technology are disrupting the scarcity-based business models of all forms of traditional commercial media. There are already examples of market failures to meet the information needs of a democracy, and the trend is accelerating. The effects are less acute in countries with more dominant public media or lower Internet penetration, but the tendencies are the same.  
1. (Old media are broken) In the United States, content creation and dissemination possibilities afforded by new technology are disrupting the scarcity-based business models of all forms of traditional commercial media. There are already examples of market failures to meet the information needs of a democracy, and the trend is accelerating. The effects are less acute in countries with more dominant public media or lower Internet penetration, but the tendencies are the same.  


2. (Bloggers didn’t break it) The rise of non-professionals critiquing, aggregating, pointing to or creating news-related content is parallel to the changes in the traditional industry; it is not the cause of the disruption.
2. (Bloggers didn’t break 'em) The rise of non-professionals critiquing, aggregating, pointing to or creating news-related content is parallel to the changes in the traditional industry; it is not the cause of the disruption.


3. (Bloggers won’t fix it) The new participatory media sphere is expanding rapidly, but without intervention will not develop the specific functions needed to fill the gaps being created by the shrinking of the traditional market.
3. (Bloggers won’t fix 'em) The new participatory media sphere is expanding rapidly, but without intervention will not develop the specific functions needed to fill the gaps created by the shrinking of the traditional market.


4. (We can do anything) Emerging technologies offer incredible potential to enhance and improve every aspect of the news and information environment: reporting, context, responsiveness, comprehensiveness, analysis, links to civic engagement.
4. (We can do almost anything) Emerging technologies offer incredible potential to enhance and improve every aspect of the news and information environment: reporting accuracy, depth, context, responsiveness, comprehensiveness, analysis, links to civic engagement.


5. (But we won’t) The mechanisms that currently drive investment of human and other resources are not functioning to take advantage of that potential.
5. (But we won’t) The mechanisms of the market and the non-market that currently drive investment of human and other resources are not working to take advantage of that potential. Not in old media, not in tech companies, not by individuals, and not by most grant-making institutions. There are bits of innovation here and there, but it's not enough.  


6. (Unless you help) Coordinated efforts by multiple stakeholders are needed to stimulate media projects with public service missions, regardless of their revenue model.  
6. (Unless you help) Coordinated efforts by multiple stakeholders are needed to stimulate media projects with public service missions, regardless of their revenue model.  
Line 18: Line 18:
7. (Use cross-breeding to let 1000 new hybrid flowers bloom) Projects should be based on cross-sector, multi-media collaboration and experimentation that builds on the expertise, resources and energy extant in traditional media institutions, technology companies, civil society, and the audience itself.
7. (Use cross-breeding to let 1000 new hybrid flowers bloom) Projects should be based on cross-sector, multi-media collaboration and experimentation that builds on the expertise, resources and energy extant in traditional media institutions, technology companies, civil society, and the audience itself.


4.1 Normative definition of desired news/information environment
 
4.1.1 Functional roles
'''What do we want from the news?'''
 
 
''Functional roles''
 
Making basic information accessible
Making basic information accessible
Providing context, analysis, “making sense of the world”
Providing context, analysis, “making sense of the world”
Watchdog function
Watchdog function
Public sphere/community-building/promoting engagement/building social capital
Building the public sphere/community/social capital, promoting engagement
4.1.2 Qualities needed to achieve those functions (cite basic journalism text?)
 
4.1.2.1 Classical (I purposely leave out “objective” it’s lost its usefulness)
Qualities needed to achieve those functions
 
''Classical (I purposely leave out “objective” -- it’s lost its usefulness)''
 
Timely
Timely
Independent
Independent
Line 33: Line 40:
Accurate
Accurate
Politically Neutral
Politically Neutral
Balanced
Pluralistic
Pluralistic
Representative of the community
Representative of the community
4.1.2.2 New
 
''New''
 
Transparent
Transparent
Interactive
Interactive
Participatory
Participatory
Multimedia
Multimedia
Responsive
Multiplatform
'''Definitions - Types of Content  
 
'''
 
'''What Kinds of Content Are We Talking About'''
 
Can we put "news" content into three categories?
 
Information – i.e., various kinds of content directly from the source and/or publicly available: sports scores, stock prices, calendar of City Council meetings, state budget  
Information – i.e., various kinds of content directly from the source and/or publicly available: sports scores, stock prices, calendar of City Council meetings, state budget  


Line 49: Line 63:
Deliberation – analysis, opinion, discussion
Deliberation – analysis, opinion, discussion


Overarching Theories we would like to test:


No one who makes any pretense of interest in current events actually relies on blogs or amateur content alone for her news (or ever will)


Low-income and minority communities are underrepresented as both topics and authors in online media
'''Hypotheses for discussion'''
 
No one who makes any pretense of interest in current events actually relies on blogs or other amateur content alone for her news (or ever will)
 
Low-income and minority communities are underrepresented as both topics and authors in online media: as much as in traditional media? or more?
 
Online pointing activity (blogging, social bookmarking, aggregating) tends to amplify a specific subset of mainstream content, making other content less visible
 
The long tail effect has limited power in the arena of current events - time sensitive material needs to be found in time to be relevant, it can't build an audience slowly
 
Linux/FOSS development is either the wrong model for participatory media or the right model interpreted the wrong way (meaning: in order to achieve the qualities and carry out the functions of news media, participatory media needs to be more organized and less volunteer-based than most people seem to think) 
 
Editing in every sense of the word is indispensable and there are critical editorial functions that are not being fulfilled by the non-traditional media


Online pointing activity (blogging, social bookmarking, aggregating) tends to amplify a specific subset of mainstream content, making other content even less visible
Hyperlocal reporting might be accomplished w/volunteers, but only with a carefully designed robust organization, probably with some central support structures


The long tail effect has only limited power in the world of current events [another GV example] this is also why Wikipedia is an inadequate model;
News agencies may end up ruling the world


Linux and FOSS is either the wrong model for new media or the right model interpreted the wrong way
It's not about people losing their willingness to pay for the news: in fact Americans have long had a culture of getting broadcast news for “free” and perhaps paying for the delivery systems, it is primarily the traditional newspaper industry’s failure to re-imagine themselves that is responsible for the business crisis they are in


Editing in every sense of the word is indispensable and there are critical editorial functions that are not being fulfilled by the current structure of the online information environment
-30-
4.3.7 Hyperlocal reporting might be accomplished w/volunteers, but only with the right organization
4.3.8 news agencies may end up ruling the world
4.3.9 we have long have a culture of getting broadcast news for “free” and perhaps paying for the delivery, it is primarily the traditional newspaper industry’s failure to re-imagine themselves that has created the business crisis they are in

Revision as of 20:31, 13 May 2008

“It’s a few nanoseconds into the Big Bang, we have four light elements and no galaxies” – Doc Searls on the state of new media

Persephone's 7 assertions (for discussion!)

1. (Old media are broken) In the United States, content creation and dissemination possibilities afforded by new technology are disrupting the scarcity-based business models of all forms of traditional commercial media. There are already examples of market failures to meet the information needs of a democracy, and the trend is accelerating. The effects are less acute in countries with more dominant public media or lower Internet penetration, but the tendencies are the same.

2. (Bloggers didn’t break 'em) The rise of non-professionals critiquing, aggregating, pointing to or creating news-related content is parallel to the changes in the traditional industry; it is not the cause of the disruption.

3. (Bloggers won’t fix 'em) The new participatory media sphere is expanding rapidly, but without intervention will not develop the specific functions needed to fill the gaps created by the shrinking of the traditional market.

4. (We can do almost anything) Emerging technologies offer incredible potential to enhance and improve every aspect of the news and information environment: reporting accuracy, depth, context, responsiveness, comprehensiveness, analysis, links to civic engagement.

5. (But we won’t) The mechanisms of the market and the non-market that currently drive investment of human and other resources are not working to take advantage of that potential. Not in old media, not in tech companies, not by individuals, and not by most grant-making institutions. There are bits of innovation here and there, but it's not enough.

6. (Unless you help) Coordinated efforts by multiple stakeholders are needed to stimulate media projects with public service missions, regardless of their revenue model.

7. (Use cross-breeding to let 1000 new hybrid flowers bloom) Projects should be based on cross-sector, multi-media collaboration and experimentation that builds on the expertise, resources and energy extant in traditional media institutions, technology companies, civil society, and the audience itself.


What do we want from the news?


Functional roles

Making basic information accessible Providing context, analysis, “making sense of the world” Watchdog function Building the public sphere/community/social capital, promoting engagement

Qualities needed to achieve those functions

Classical (I purposely leave out “objective” -- it’s lost its usefulness)

Timely Independent Relevant Accessible (language, price, delivery) Comprehensive Accurate Politically Neutral Balanced Pluralistic Representative of the community

New

Transparent Interactive Participatory Multimedia Multiplatform


What Kinds of Content Are We Talking About

Can we put "news" content into three categories?

Information – i.e., various kinds of content directly from the source and/or publicly available: sports scores, stock prices, calendar of City Council meetings, state budget

Reporting – stories or other items created by author(s) based on gathering information from one or more sources and/or observing events

Deliberation – analysis, opinion, discussion


Hypotheses for discussion

No one who makes any pretense of interest in current events actually relies on blogs or other amateur content alone for her news (or ever will)

Low-income and minority communities are underrepresented as both topics and authors in online media: as much as in traditional media? or more?

Online pointing activity (blogging, social bookmarking, aggregating) tends to amplify a specific subset of mainstream content, making other content less visible

The long tail effect has limited power in the arena of current events - time sensitive material needs to be found in time to be relevant, it can't build an audience slowly

Linux/FOSS development is either the wrong model for participatory media or the right model interpreted the wrong way (meaning: in order to achieve the qualities and carry out the functions of news media, participatory media needs to be more organized and less volunteer-based than most people seem to think)

Editing in every sense of the word is indispensable and there are critical editorial functions that are not being fulfilled by the non-traditional media

Hyperlocal reporting might be accomplished w/volunteers, but only with a carefully designed robust organization, probably with some central support structures

News agencies may end up ruling the world

It's not about people losing their willingness to pay for the news: in fact Americans have long had a culture of getting broadcast news for “free” and perhaps paying for the delivery systems, it is primarily the traditional newspaper industry’s failure to re-imagine themselves that is responsible for the business crisis they are in

-30-